[Editor’s Note: I’m unable to upload the actual video to the site so please click on the url to this extremely important interview with Dr. Peter McCullough and German legal expert Reiner Fuellmich.
Dr. McCullough makes it resoundingly clear that the world is now under a global bioterrorist attack and the weapon of choice by the criminals responsible for this is the experimental “vaccines” that are being pushed on people around the planet.
It should also be made clear that Dr. McCullough is acting with the greatest of integrity and his and those associated with him have stopped trying to communicate their concerns with the established government agencies and the WHO and the CDC and are, to use an old expression, taking it to the streets BIG TIME in order to show and convince THE PEOPLE themselves how this contrived assault upon America and the rest of the world has been orchestrated and to help people realize what is REALLY going on as opposed to what the Big Brother Mainstream Media is fervently trying to brainwash everyone in to believing.
The factor of FEAR has so many otherwise sensible people mesmerized to the point where they can’t think rationally any longer and so it’s vital that Doctors and other health professionals plus the Alternative News media and Social Media and the legal professions act on their own to counter this aspect of the bioterrorist agenda.
Please share this with as many people as you possibly can. It’s a video that will convince you of the urgency and necessity to act somehow to help spread the truth about what’s really going on. These criminals aren’t satisfied with killing off the old folks and now they’re going after the youth and future generations. THEY MUST BE STOPPED!]
The Statue Wreckers & Their Establishment Enablers!
Gerry T. Neal
[Editor’s Note: The behaviour of those spoken of in Gerry T. Neal’s article is so grotesque as to almost be unbelievable. After watching the rioting, looting, burning and destruction throughout the USA over the past couple of years by the BLM and foreign sponsored Antifa crowds it’s extremely unsettling to see this sort of unhinged behaviour taking place now in Canada. Nothing angers me more that to see our history being destroyed by idiots who have no inkling of what they’re doing.
But what’s more disturbing to me is the mainstream media and their devilish determined efforts to incite the youth and in particular the indigenous peoples of Canada with this latest media blitz highlighting the Residential School issue. Neal’s portrayal of this ongoing attack upon Christianity, sponsored through surreptitious efforts on the part of every other agency available that wishes to destroy the one religion that brought the western world through the past 2000 years of history, is the most concise and poignant expression of Truth on this issue that I’ve come across. Readers are advised to share this story wherever possible.]
When a mob vandalizes or tears down statues that have been in place for generations of nation-builders, whether statesmen like Sir John A. Macdonald, Father of Confederation and first Prime Minister of the Dominion of Canada, or educators like Egerton Ryerson, one of the chief architects of the Upper Canadian – Ontarian for the hopelessly up-to-date – public school system, back the in days when schools were a credit to their builders rather than a disgrace, this tells us much more about the mob than about the historical figures whose memory they are attacking. It is far easier to tear something down than it is to build something, especially something of lasting benefit. It is also much quicker. What these acts tell us is that the members of these mobs, whether taken individually or collectively, who are howling for the “cancelling” of the memories of men like Macdonald and Ryerson, do not have it in them to achieve a thousandth of what such men accomplished. Driving them down this quick and easy, but ultimately treacherous and deadly, path of desecration and destruction, is the spirit of Envy, which is not mere jealousy, the wish to have what others have, but the hatred of others for being, having, or doing what you do not and cannot be, have, or do yourself. It was traditionally considered among the very worst of the Seven Deadly Sins, second only to Pride. This makes it almost fitting, in a perverse sort of way, that last weekend’s mob assault on the statue of Ryerson at the University that bears his name, took place at the beginning of the month which, to please the alphabet soup people of all the colours of the rainbow, now bears the name of that Sin in addition to the Roman name for the queen of Olympus.
The toppling of the Ryerson statue came at the end of a week in which the Canadian media, evidently tired of the bat flu after a year and a half, found a new dead horse to flog. Late in May, a couple of days after the anniversary of the incident which, after it was distorted and blown out of proportion by the media, sparked last year’s wave of race riots and “Year Zero” Cultural Maoism, and just in time to launch Indigenous History Month, yet another new handle for the month formerly known as June, the Kamloops Indian Band made an announcement. They had hired someone to use some fancy newfangled sonar gizmo to search the grounds of the old Indian Residential School at Kamloops and, lo and behold, they had discovered 215 unmarked graves.
The Canadian mainstream media was quick to label this discovery “shocking”. This speaks extremely poorly about the present state of journalistic integrity in this country. When used as an adjective, the word shocking expresses a negative judgement about that which is so described but it also generally conveys a sense of surprise on the part of the person doing the judging. There was nothing in the Kamloops announcement, however, that ought to have been surprising. It revealed nothing new about the Indian Residential Schools. That there are unmarked graves on the grounds of these schools has been known all along. The fourth volume of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Final Report is entitled Missing Children and Unmarked Burials. It is 273 pages long and was published in December of 2015. According to this volume the death rate due to such factors as disease – tuberculosis was the big one – and suicide was much higher among aboriginal children at the Residential Schools than among school children in the general population. The TRC attributed this to the inadequacy of government standards and regulations for these schools which fell under the jurisdiction of the federal government rather than the provincial education ministries like other schools, as well as inadequate enforcement of such standards and regulations, and inadequate funding. Had the TRC been the impartial body of inquiry it made itself out to be it would also have compared the death rate among Residential School children to that among aboriginal children who remained at home on the reserves. At any rate, according to the TRC Report, unless the families lived nearby or could afford to have the bodies sent to them, they were generally buried in cemeteries at the schools which were abandoned and fell into disuse and decay after the schools were closed. All that this “new discovery” has added to what is already contained in that volume is the location of 215 of these graves. One could be forgiven for thinking that all the progressives in the mainstream Canadian media who have been spinning the Residential School narrative into a wrecking ball to use against Canada and the men who built her are not actually that familiar with the contents of the TRC Report.
The Canada-bashing progressives have been reading all sorts of ridiculous conclusions into the discovery of these graves that the actual evidence in no way bears out. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission was hardly an impartial and unbiased body of inquiry. Its end did not seem to be the first noun in its title so much as painting as unflattering a portrait of the Indian Residential Schools, the Canadian churches, and the Canadian government as was possible. Even still, it did not go so far as to accuse the schools of the mass murder of children. The most brazen of the progressive commentators have now been pointing to the discovery of the graves and making that accusation, and their slightly less brazen colleagues have been reporting the story in such a way as to lead their audiences to that conclusion without their outright saying it. This is irresponsible gutter journalism at its worst. The Kamloops band and its sonar technicians have not discovered anything that the TRC Report had not already told us was there, and bodies have not been exhumed, let alone examined for cause of death. Indeed, they did not even discover a “mass grave” as innumerable media commentators have falsely stated, with some continuing to falsely say this despite the band chief having issued an update in which she explicitly stated “This is not a mass grave”. The significance of this is that it shows that the media has been painting the picture of a far more calloused disposal of bodies than the evidence supports or the band claims.
The media, of course, are not acting in bona fide. This time last year, they were using the death of George Floyd to promote a movement that was inciting race riots all across the United States and even throughout the larger Western world. Coinciding with this was a wave of mob attacks on the monuments of a wide assortment of Western nation-builders, institutional founders, statesmen, and other honoured historical figures. The New York Times, the American trash rag of record, had been laying the foundation for this for months by running Nikole Hannah-Jones’ 1619 Project, a revisionist distortion of American history that interprets everything by viewing it through the lens of slavery, in its Sunday Magazine supplement. What we are seeing up here this year is simply the Canadian left-wing gutter press trying to reproduce its American cousin’s success of last year.
Those who use their influence to support statue-toppling mobs have no business commenting on history whatsoever. By their very actions they demonstrate that they have not learned a fairly basic historical lesson. Movements that seek to tear down a country’s history – her past cannot be torn down, but her history, her “remembered past” to use John Lukacs’ definition, can – never end well but rather in disaster, destruction, and misery for all. The Jacobins attempted this in France in the 1790s when they started history over with their Republic at “Year One”, and ended up with the Reign of Terror. It has been a pretty standard feature of all Communist revolutions since. Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge, when they took over Cambodia in 1975, declared it to be “Year Zero”. Watch the film “The Killing Fields” or read my friend Reaksa Himm’s memoir The Tears of My Soul to find out what that was like. Anybody who fails to grasp the simple historical fact that these are terrible examples and not ones to be emulated has no business passing judgement on the errors of the historical figures who built countries and institutions, led them through difficult periods, and otherwise did the long and difficult work of construction, enriching future generations, rather than the short and easy work of destruction that can only impoverish them.
There are undoubtedly those who would feel that this comparison of today’s statue-topplers who are now likening our country’s founders to Hitler along with the Jacobins, Maoists, Pol Pot and other statue-toppling, country-and-civilization destroyers of the past is unfair. It is entirely appropriate, however. It is one thing to acknowledge that bad things took place at the Indian Residential Schools and to give those who suffered those things a platform and the opportunity to share their story. It is another thing altogether to use those bad things to paint a cartoonish caricature so as to condemn the schools, the churches that administered them, and the country herself, wholesale, and to silence those whose testimony as to their experiences runs contrary to this one-sided, un-nuanced, narrative. It is one thing to acknowledge that admired leaders of the past were human beings and thus full of flaws, or even to point out examples of how they fell short of the standards of their own day or of timeless standards. It is something quite different to use their flaws to discredit and dismiss their tremendous accomplishments and, even worse, to condemn them for failing to hold attitudes that are now all but ubiquitous but which nobody anywhere in the world held until the present generation.
When the so-called Truth and Reconciliation process began – I don’t mean the appointment of the Commission but the proceedings that led to the Indian Residential Schools Settlement which brought about the creation of the Commission, so we are talking about two and a half decades ago – the discussion was primarily about physical and sexual abuse that some of the alumni of the schools had suffered there, over which they had initiated the lawsuits that led to the Settlement. With the creation of the TRC, however, the discussion came to be dominated by people with another very different agenda. Their agenda was to condemn the entire Residential Schools system as a project of “cultural genocide”.
The concept of “cultural genocide” is nonsensical. Genocide, a term coined by Raphael Lemkin in 1944, means the murder of a “people”, in the sense of a group with a common ancestry and identity. The Holocaust of World War II is the best known example. The mass murder of Tutsis in Rwanda towards the end of that country’s civil war in 1994 is a more recent example. The concept of “cultural genocide” was thought up by the same man who coined the term. It refers to efforts to destroy a people’s cultural identity without killing the actual people. Since the equation of something that does not involve killing actual people with mass murder ought to be morally repugnant to any thinking person, the concept should have been condemned and rejected from the moment Lemkin first conceived it. Soon after it was conceived, however, the leaders of certain [Censored] groups began using it as a club against Christianity. Christianity teaches that Jesus of Nazareth is the Christ, the Messiah, the Redeemer prophesied in the Old Testament Who established the promised New Covenant through His death and Resurrection and Who is the only way to God for [Censored] and Gentiles alike. Christianity’s primary mission from Jesus Christ is evangelism – telling the world the Gospel, the Good News about Who Jesus is and what He has done. While not everybody believes the Gospel when they hear it and it is not our mission to compel anybody to believe, obviously the desired end of evangelism is for everybody to believe. Since [Censored] has long taught that a [Censored] who converts to Christianity ceases to be a [Censored], the [Censored] leaders in question argued that evangelism amounts to cultural genocide – if all the [Censored] believed the Gospel, there would be no [Censored] any more. On the basis of this kind of reasoning they began pressuring Christian Churches to change their doctrines and liturgical practices as they pertain to the evangelism of [Censored]. Sadly, far too many Church leaders proved to be weak in the face of this kind of pressure.
Canada’s Laurentian political class showed a similar lack of backbone when it came to defending our country against the smear that the Residential Schools were designed to wipe out Native Indian cultural identities. Indeed, their attitude throughout the entire “Truth and Reconciliation” process was to accept the blame for whatever accusations were thrown against Canada and to refuse to hold the accusers accountable to even the most basic standards of courtroom justice. Imagine a trial where the judge allows only the prosecutor to call witnesses, denies the defense the right to cross examine, and refuses to allow the defense to make a case. That will give you a picture of what the trial of Canada by the TRC over the Residential Schools was like.
The reality is that had Canada wanted to erase Native Indian cultural identity she would have abolished the reserves, torn up the treaties and declared the Indians to be ordinary citizens like everyone else, insisted that they all live among other Canadians, and that their children go to the same public schools as everybody else. In other words, she would have done the exact opposite of what she actually did. The Canadian government’s policy was clearly to preserve Indian cultural identity, not to eradicate it. Had they wanted to do the latter, residential schools would have been particularly ill-suited to the task. The TRC maintains that the idea was to break Indian cultural identity by taking children away from the cultural influence of their parents. If this was the case one would think the government would have had all Indian children sent to these schools. In actuality, however, in the approximately century and a half that these schools operated, only a minority of Indian children were sent there. This was a very small minority in the early days of the Dominion when Sir John A. Macdonald, whom the TRC et al seem more interested in vilifying than anyone else, was Prime Minister. The government also ran day schools on the reserves and in those days the government only forced children to go to the residential schools when their parents persistently neglected to send them to the day schools. The Dominion had made it mandatory for all Indian children within a certain age range to attend school – just as the provinces had made it mandatory for all other children within the same age range to attend school. It was much later in Canadian history, after the government decided to make the schools serve the second function of being foster group homes for children removed from unsafe homes by social workers that a majority of Indian children were sent to the residential schools. Even then, the eradication of Indian cultural identity is hardly a reasonable interpretation of the government’s intent.
The TRC, in the absence of serious challenge from either Canada’s political class or the fourth estate, created a narrative indicting our country and its founders for “cultural genocide”, featuring a one-sided caricature of the Indian Residential Schools. Now, after a discovery that adds nothing that was not already contained in the TRC Report, left-wing radicals egged on by the mendacious and meretricious media, have gone far beyond the TRC in their defamatory accusations of murder against the schools and their Pol Potish demands that we “cancel” our country, her history, and her historical figures. It is about time that we stood up to these thugs who in their envy and hatred of those who did what they themselves could never do by building our country wish to tear it all down. It is slightly encouraging that the Conservatives were able to stop the motion by Jimmy Dhaliwal’s Canada-hating socialist party to have Parliament declare the Residential Schools to have been a genocide. I didn’t think they had the kives – the Finnish word for “stones” – the bearing of which as a last name by a local reporter brings to mind how the biggest man in Robin Hood’s band of Merry Men was called “Little John” – to do so.
For anyone looking for more information about the side of the Indian Residential Schools story that the Left wants suppressed I recommend Stephen K. Roney’s Playing The Indian Card: Everything You Know About Canada’s “First Nations” is WRONG!, Bonsecours Editions, 2018 and From Truth Comes Reconciliation: An Assessment of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Report, edited by Rodney A. Clifton and Mark DeWolf and just published by the Frontier Centre for Public Policy here in Winnipeg earlier this year.
Since the progressive wackos are calling for Canada Day to be cancelled, I encourage you this July 1st to fly the old Red Ensign, sing “God Save the Queen” and “The Maple Leaf Forever”, raise your glass to Sir John and celebrate Dominion Day with gusto. The only thing we need to be ashamed of in Canada is the way we have let these ninnies who are constantly apologizing for everything Canada has been and done in the past walk all over us. While I seldom recommend emulating Americans in this case I say that it is time we forget about our customary politeness and take up the attitude of old Merle, who sang “When they’re runnin’ down my country, man, They’re walkin’ on the fightin’ side of me”.
Most people don’t know about the sovereign, independent nation/state of the “Chilcotin” located in what was formerly known as the heart of “British Columbia, Canada” located between the 50 & 53.5 parallels, [combining the currently known regions of the Chilcotin plateau, the Cariboo plateau, the coast line and the Lillooet areas] however technically speaking the Chilcotin Nation was never part of “Canada”.
Even more importantly what most people don’t know, is how the Chilcotin Nation could benefit them!!!
For example, the Constitution of the Tsilhqot’in Nation was ratified March 15, 2015 by the hereditary Chilcotin National Congress, which created the first international aboriginal court called the “Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in”. This court could overturn or nullify laws or bills in Canada or the USA or wherever native people live on this planet and is currently the highest court in North America.
Most people don’t know that the Universal Supreme Court has outlawed forced vaccinations on December 15, 2020. People who do not want to be force vaccinated need to rely on this court ruling. There are many businesses in the USA who are now compelling their employees to get the Covid lethal injection and people are complying, not knowing an international court has already ruled on this subject and prohibited such requirements.
As of yet no one has asked the Universal Supreme Court to outlaw Covid lethal injections per se, but the minute someone brings such an action the USCT can outlaw all Covid “vaccines” and thereby save many lives.
People can also bring indictments to the Universal Supreme Court against those who are involved in committing genocide, eugenics and world depopulation. People are being murdered world wide needlessly when there is an international court which could stop this madness. People just need to support the validity of this bona fide court system.
The Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in is just as valid a court as any other existing court (if not more so) based on international laws such as the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of State, that is why no one in Canada or the USA has ever challenged its validity based in law because they know they would lose. Every ruling issued by the USCT has to be upheld by every other court until someone can prove the USCT to be false (which nobody can do).
Furthermore, since 2015, the Chilcotin National Congress has sought to increase the standard of living for its citizens/members, ironically meeting with very little success. For example, the CNC has abrogated the BC Forest Act to replace it with the Tsilhqot’in Forest Actin an effort to save the logging/sawmilling industry by deregulating the business and guaranteeing employment for everyone. Instead of paying the stumpage fees to the CNC the logging and sawmilling companies decided to stick with Canada and now most people in the forestry industry are out of work.
Likewise, the Chilcotin National Congress tried to drastically reduce the sales tax, property and business taxes their citizens/members had to pay but that was also met with scorn and ridicule by Canadian government employees and bribed native folks which the public decided to follow. Thus they convinced the public to continue attorning to the jurisdiction of illegally invading and occupying Canadian shills by paying the higher taxes to Canada.
The Chilcotin National Congress wants to implement free education for all from early childhood to post secondary for all its citizens/members, free dental as well as medical headed by a brilliant Chinese physician who has extensive knowledge in both conventional and alternative medicines, free land to give away for all members and citizens for agricultural pursuits, free care for the elderly and more, but no one seems interested in attorning to the jurisdiction of the Chilcotin National Congress.
Oh, did I mention, that the Chilcotin National Congress wants to eradicate all poverty and unemployment, guaranteeing housing and employment for every citizen/member? But alas, the Canadian unemployment and poverty rate seemed more desirable to native and non-natives.
Which again brings me back to the future death rate from Covid shots in the Chilcotin Nation which could have been prevented if people would have supported the Chilcotin National Congress and the Universal Supreme Court in a timely manner. Now, instead, many will suffer and die needlessly because of the lack of support for the CNC and USCT. Canada, with all its corruption, crime and eugenics/depopulation agenda appears to be the choice of the day.
No wonder Trudeau and the New World Order are having a good laugh. The Chilcotin Nation is undoubtedly the NWO’s best kept secret and its most feared opponent.
So, it will remain interesting to see how many people Trudeau and the NWO will have to murder before people will get it and support the Chilcotin National Congress and the Universal Supreme Court and the Chilcotin Nation. It will be interesting to see how long people will continue to be trauma bonded to their Canadian/USA terrorists “governments”.
For those who are starting to get it though, grievances, criminal and civil cases as well as appeals from other courts can be attorned to the USCT today by e-mailing the court at: firstname.lastname@example.org
For further information regarding the Chilcotin National Congress please contact Suzanne Holland at 1-250-303-0267
I recently received a letter in the mail from a woman in Florida describing the illnesses from which she has suffered for the past dozen years: Hashimoto’s disease, liver dysfunction, sinus infection, “exploding head,” complete loss of smell and partial loss of taste. “After all this time,” she wrote, “I now wonder how much radiation has been a part of my illness.” She has joined a Stop 5G group in her city. To protect herself she keeps her cell phone in a “faraday pouch” when she is not using it, and she turns off her wifi at night. She also asked about the effectiveness of the various devices, pendants and chips being sold to protect oneself from the radiation. I replied to her as follows:
“You are right to wonder how much radiation is a part of your illness. First and foremost, you should not ever use a cell phone or WiFi. Getting rid of all wireless on your person and in your home will make a tremendous difference in your health. A faraday pouch does not block all the radiation. A cell phone radiates even when it is off, as long as the battery is in it. And it takes your body several days to recover, even from a single two-minute phone call. No products will protect you from the radiation — if they do anything at all, those products are dangerous.”
She was shocked, because that is not what everyone else has been telling her. “I have found that most people do not believe cell phones are the issue, just the towers. I must get a landline and work from there,” she wrote back.
More Radiation Than Cell Towers
It is beyond me how anyone can expect their cell phone to work if all the towers are not there, but that is not the worst error people are making. Somehow, they have convinced themselves that most of their exposure to radiation is coming from the towers and not their phones and computers. Not only is the opposite true, but it is all one system. The more radiation the towers put out, the less radiation your phone has to emit to connect with them. The less radiation the towers put out, the more radiation your phone emits. You can’t have one without the other.
A cell phone operating at 2 watts (maximum power) held six inches from your head exposes your brain to more radiation than if there were a 200-watt tower ten feet away, or a 2000-watt tower thirty feet away. If you live in a city with a lot of towers, your phone may only emit a milliwatt of power (0.001 watts). But then you’re getting the same radiation from the towers that you would have gotten from your phone if all the towers were not there. It’s all one system. And if you put the 1-milliwatt phone up against your head, you are still exposing your brain to more radiation than from all the towers in the city.
And even when you are only texting, and the phone is only emitting a milliwatt of power, as long as you are touching the phone, the frequencies are being conducted through your hands into your heart, lungs and brain, and your whole body is radiating them into your environment and exposing everyone to them that you pass on the street. And this is not a good thing, because the harm done by the radiation does not depend on power level at all. It depends on the informational content, and we are living in a crazy age where we demand more and more information from our devices, at greater and greater speeds, while our axons and dendrites are trying to send complex information to our brains, and our hearts’ pacemakers are trying to communicate with our hearts’ atria and ventricles, and the oxidative phosphorylation enzymes in our mitochondria are trying to send electrons to the oxygen we breathe in order to generate the energy for life, and our cells are trying to whisper to other cells with instructions about where to go, and what kinds of cells to become, to choreograph our growth, and to orchestrate the healing process when we are injured or ill. And even one milliwatt is millions of times louder than the whispered signals between our cells, which can no longer follow the instructions that they can no longer hear.
And the result is diabetes, and heart disease, and cancer, and neurological disease, at rates that just 25 years ago, at the beginning of the wireless revolution, would have seemed unimaginable, but that are now accepted as normal, because the population is not connecting them, is not willing to connect them, to their cause.
Living in a Prison Created by Phones
I communicate with hundreds of thousands of people, a large number of whom are environmental refugees. Year after year they are moving further and further away from civilization, desperately trying to live where cell phones do not work in order to stay alive, while the rest of the population has grown more and more dependent on their phones, counting on them to work wherever they go.
Even if others know on some level that there is a radiation problem, they don’t really know. “I’ve got to have a phone in case of emergency” means their phones have to be able to work everywhere they go, which means there have to be cell towers everywhere they go, especially in the middle of nowhere, and it means they are condemning all those refugees to torture and death. Never mind all the insects, birds and animals that can never be free of radiation, anywhere on earth, no matter where they fly to or run to to stay alive. If a cell phone will work where they fly, they are being irradiated.
When the wireless revolution came to the United States in 1996, I stayed alive only by leaving my home and my city and my family and friends and camping out in places where cell phones did not work for the next eight years. I have stayed alive since 2004 by living in a location where the conductivity of the earth is extremely high, and I cannot leave. Santa Fe is a nice place, but I am not here by choice. I am here because there is no other place left to even camp. I am here because it is one of the few places on earth that I can stay alive in spite of the fact that a cell phone will work here. It is a nice prison, but a prison nonetheless, a prison from which I have not left for more than a few hours since 2007. I am kept in this prison by everyone who owns a cell phone and expects to be able to use it “in case of emergency.”
I, and the refugees in Green Bank, West Virginia, and the refugees in the French Alps, and the refugees sleeping in their vehicles in the fewer and fewer places that still exist where cell phones do not work, are not different from everyone else, except that at some point in our lives our eyes were opened to what was making us so sick, and that we learned to recognize the effects of radiation and to avoid radiation in order to survive, instead of dying of heart attacks, strokes, and neurological disease. We learned to feel the radiation, which everyone else could also learn to feel if they would only stop using their devices that are numbing them to the pain, stop using them long enough to discover what a horror they are, and what a tremendous difference it makes to their physical and psychological health to get rid of them, permanently, from their person and their home. What a tremendous difference for themselves, for the refugees, for the birds, for the whales. For the honey bee, waiting, imploring, at the top of this newsletter.
LAWSUITS BEING FILED IN THE D.C. CIRCUIT
AND THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Children’s Health Defense v. FCC
On February 26, 2021, Children’s Health Defense sued the Federal Communications Commission in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. CHD is asking the court to overturn a new, illegal, unconstitutional order that the FCC had issued the previous day.
The FCC had revised its rules for Over-the-Air Reception Devices (OTARD), which sounds innocuous enough. Except that the new rules have nothing to do with reception devices. Instead they have repealed all zoning regulations for broadband antennas and towers on private property by calling them “reception devices.” Wireless internet providers can now build base stations wherever they please on anyone’s property anywhere in the United States and are no longer subject to any restrictions by cities, counties or states in the unlimited expansion of their networks of towers and antennas.
The lawsuit is Case No. 21-1075 in the D.C. Circuit, and CHD’s opening brief is due on June 23, 2021. An amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief in support of CHD’s lawsuit is being prepared now that will represent Stop 5G groups, other anti-wireless organizations, organizations representing people injured by radio-frequency radiation, and other environmental organizations in the United States. The amicus brief is due on June 30, 2021. If your U.S. organization would like to join the amicus brief, please contact Petra Brokken at email@example.com.
City of Portland v. FCC
In 2018, hundreds of cities and counties joined together to sue the FCC over new orders prohibiting states and local governments from regulating cell towers in the public rights-of-way, and on August 12, 2020 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled against them. On October 22, 2020 the Ninth Circuit denied their petition for rehearing. On March 22, 2021 they appealed their case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is City of Portland v. Federal Communications Commission, Docket No. 20-1354.
Together, the FCC orders under challenge by those cities and counties, and the OTARD order under challenge by Children’s Health Defense, mean that local governments in the United States can no longer regulate most towers or antennas anywhere — not on public land and not on private land.
Santa Fe Alliance v. City of Santa Fe
In 2018, the Santa Fe Alliance for Public Health and Safety sued the City of Santa Fe, the Attorney General of New Mexico, and the United States of America.
Unlike the petitioners in Portland v. FCC, which are suing to be able to protect the health, safety and welfare of their citizens, the City of Santa Fe and State of New Mexico have voluntarily relinquished that right. Both the City and the State have passed laws repealing all zoning regulations for antennas and towers in the public rights-of-way.
The Santa Fe Alliance is challenging the constitutionality of those City and State laws, and of Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which prohibits local governments from regulating cell towers on the basis of health and denies people injured by radio-frequency radiation of any remedy.
On March 30, 2021, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled against the Santa Fe Alliance, and on May 27, 2021, the Court denied our petition for rehearing. We are preparing to appeal our case to the United States Supreme Court. Our petition for certiorari must be filed in the Supreme Court by August 25, 2021.
Our lawsuit goes to the heart of the problem, which is the unconstitutional law passed by Congress in 1996 that has enabled a thickening fog of radiation to envelop this nation ever since.
Our excellent attorney, Theresa Kraft, who argued our case in the Tenth Circuit, has been sick and in and out of the hospital for two months following her second COVID vaccination, and we must find another attorney to replace her. We are currently contacting law firms. Please contact me immediately if you are an attorney who can help, or if you have a referral to one.
A new study has confirmed that people who have been vaccinated against COVID produce excessive spike proteins that are capable of passing the Blood Brain Barrier causing irreparable damage to the brain — and Pfizer’s own documents warn that vaccinated people actually shed these excessive spike proteins putting the unvaccinated at risk for harm:
In their latest issue brief, America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) warned how spike proteins resulting from experimental COVID-19 gene therapy vaccines have the capacity to 1.) pass through the “blood-brain barrier” causing neurological damage, 2.) be “shed” by the vaccinated, bringing about sickness in unvaccinated children and adults, and 3.) cause irregular vaginal bleeding in women.
Released last week and titled “Identifying Post-vaccination Complications & Their Causes: an Analysis of Covid-19 Patient Data,” the stated purpose of the document is “to provide additional information for concerned citizens, health experts, and policymakers about adverse events and other post-vaccination issues resulting from the three experimental COVID-19 vaccines currently administered under EUA (emergency use authorization)” by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The non-profit organization highlighted the thousands of adverse events which are related to these “vaccines” and captured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). “Yet these complications have received a fraction of the attention paid to J&J’s blood-clotting controversy,” they lamented with dismay, asking, “Why?”
In taking a closer look at this data, AFLDS presents “some major categories of concern as-yet publicly unaddressed by either the FDA or CDC,” asserting that failure of these regulators “to consider these and other ‘known unknowns’ is a dereliction of basic medical research.”
They breakout their general categories of concern as shown below:
First, there are significant fears regarding the wide distribution of these new vaccines, which employ a new technology and remain only experimental without full approval from the FDA. Instead of employing an attenuated antigen response – as happens with conventional vaccines – these experimental agents introduce something called a “spike protein” into one’s system.
“It takes years to be sure something new is safe,” the AFLDS document confirms. “No one knows definitively the long-term health implications for the body and brain, especially among the young, related to this spike protein. In addition, if documented problems with the protein do arise, there will never be any way to reverse the adverse effects in those already vaccinated.”
Second, unlike conventional vaccines, these spike proteins, along with “lipid nanoparticles” have the capacity to pass through the “blood-brain barrier” which provides special protection for these sensitive areas of the body.
“There simply has not been enough time to know what brain problems and how often a brain problem will develop from that,” the document warns.
Risks from such penetration include “chronic inflammation and thrombosis (clotting) in the neurological system, contributing to tremors, chronic lethargy, stroke, Bell’s Palsy and ALS-type symptoms. The lipid nanoparticles can potentially fuse with brain cells, resulting in delayed neuro-degenerative disease. And the mRNA-induced spike protein can bind to brain tissue 10 to 20 times stronger than the spike proteins that are (naturally) part of the original virus.”
Third, as these experimental vaccines produce many trillions of spike proteins in their recipients, these vaccinated individuals “can shed some of these (spike protein) particles to close contacts,” causing disease in them.
In an email correspondence with LifeSiteNews, Dr. Simone Gold, the founder of AFLDS, directed this writer to an April 29 tweet where she posted a document from Pfizer’s experimental trials in which the pharmaceutical giant “acknowledges this mechanism” of potential shedding, she wrote.
As the document states, one can be “exposed to [the] study intervention due to environmental exposure,” including “by inhalation or skin contact” with someone involved in the study, or with another who has been exposed in the same way.
And this, according to AFLDS, can be dangerous. As the issues brief continues, “the spike proteins are pathogenic (‘disease causing’) just like the full virus.” Furthermore, these “spike proteins bind more tightly than the fully intact virus” and thus cases around the world of “pericarditis, shingles, pneumonia, blood clots in the extremities and brain, Bell’s Palsy, vaginal bleeding and miscarriages have been reported in persons who are near persons who have been vaccinated.” Such shedding also “appears to be causing wide variety of autoimmune disease (where the body attacks its own tissue) in some persons.”
In addition, other more serious dangers to even the unvaccinated are possible due to the fact that these “spike proteins can cross the blood brain barrier, unlike traditional vaccines.”
Fourth, such shedding leaves children vulnerable if they are in proximity to parents and teachers who have received these experimental vaccines. While the threat of COVID-19 to the young is rightly described as “irrelevant,” including a 99.997% survival rate for those under 20 years of age, AFLDS is concerned some children may become symptomatic due to such proximity to the vaccinated. At such point there is a danger that “public health bureaucrats” might use such cases to “speculate that a child’s illness is related to a SARS-CoV-2 ‘variant,’” when it is a result of contact with vaccinated adults.
“Our other concern is that children could develop long-term chronic autoimmune disease including neurological problems due to the fact that children have decades ahead of them and trillions of the spike proteins mentioned above.”
Fifth, “AFLDS is aware of thousands of reports involving vaginal bleeding, post-menopausal vaginal bleeding, and miscarriages following COVID-19 vaccination as well as anecdotal reports of similar adverse events among those in close contact with the vaccinated.” While at this point the independent physicians organization “cannot comment definitively on the close contacts” other than to mention they “have heard reports of this worldwide,” the many reported incidents of post-vaccination vaginal bleeding establishes a clear “connection between the vaccine and irregular bleeding.”
“Despite this clear-cut evidence, menstrual-cycle changes were not listed among the FDA’s common side effects in its phase-three clinical participants. Women’s reproductive health needs to be taken seriously rather than waved away by agenda-driven public health officials,” the brief reads.
Finally, acknowledging the “irrepressible economic incentive among pharmaceutical companies” to market unnecessary and dangerous childhood COVID vaccines, boosters, and the like, AFLDS insists “Public health experts should stop and assess data on possible vaccine side effects and related post-vaccination questions before it is too late.”
So Pfizer’s own internal report (on page 69) warns health care workers about being exposed to people who have been vaccinated — which is rather ironic considering most health care workers are required to be vaccinated themselves.
Anyone walking in to a hospital or doctor’s office will be exposed to the spike proteins being shed by virtually the entire staff of workers — but the concentrations will be low compared to what is in the blood streams of the vaccinated.
Of course, the amount of spike proteins you could actually breathe in is miniscule compared to the amount that these vaccines are programming vaccinated people’s bodies to manufacture — non-stop 24/7.
A recent study confirms that the spike proteins produced by the mRNA vaccines can indeed cause serious health problems as they continuously build up in the vaccinated.
As literally trillions of these spike proteins build up and overwhelm your body, your internal organs will begun to shut down and your brain will stop functioning — which is why a U.K. government report is predicting a huge percentage of doubly vaccinated people will be dying in the coming “Third Wave” of the fake pandemic.
This coming massive death toll will, of course, be blamed on new, exotic-sound virus “variant” — or better yet, “scare-iants” — and the “selfish unvaccinated.”
Needless to say, it would behoove everyone who is unvaccinated to avoid extended exposure to the vaccinated, especially in confined spaces.
The entire world has never been deceived on such a massive scale.
It would appear that Satan indeed has been loosed from his prison — and he knows his time is short to make this final move to dominate this world before he is destroyed.
Are we witnessing the promised end?
Editor’s Note: Within a couple of hours of posting this information I received the following email notification from Twitter. Gates & Fauci must have shares in that Satanic Twatter platform too.
[Editor’s Note: I have been trying for some time now to find and post videos with Dr. Peter McCullough. His work and his valiant efforts to set the narrative straight with respect to all aspects of the Covid-19 plandemic is admirable. Please try to view and then share this interview and any others I’m able to post.]
[Editor’s Note: This article was prepared for people living in the United States but the information it contains is very relevant to Canada as well. It has links in places for info connected to our country.
Please try to share this with family and friends as it has a tremendous amount of information and links to much more.]
May 27, 2021 (True Whole Human) — Recently, a friend of mine who adamantly did NOT want to get a COVID vaccine did so anyway because of pressure from her peers and her employer.
For any of you who feel pressured to get a COVID jab and feel like it’s becoming impossible to say no, I’ve got your back.
Before I’m done you will:
Understand why vaccine mandates and coercion are illegal.
Have a practical way to converse about your decision to opt out.
Feel confident in your decision, and (I hope) feel emboldened to speak up.
Side note: In case you missed my recent article on 18 reasons I won’t be getting a COVID vaccine, you might check it out if you want additional talking points beyond what’s below.
Dealing with employer & school mandates
If I were an employee or student who was required or feeling coerced into getting a COVID vaccine, here’s how I would strategically handle it …
Ask for exemptions
Politely, and with a curious tone, ask what exemptions are in place for people who need to decline the shot?
If you get any pushback for asking that question, you can kindly say that is between you and your doctor.
Hopefully, you’ll be presented with how to file/qualify for the allowed exemptions and that will be the end of the story.
If asking for exemptions does not prove to be fruitful, here’s what I would do next.
Point out liability
Pharma can’t be sued for injuries or deaths caused by their vaccines, but companies, schools, and individuals that mandate them can be.
If your institution is trying to mandate or coerce you into taking something against your will, not only is that 100 percent ILLEGAL (more on that below), by forcing you to take a product they make themselves liable if you get injured or die.
No organization wants to hear that, but given the way our government is promoting the COVID “vaccines,” it is understandable that most institutions don’t even know that mandates are illegal, nor do they understand the liability mandates expose them to.
To give you legal and ethical ground to stand on, let’s start here …
Vaccine mandates for experimental COVID shots are against the law in the U.S.
You can see the actual law in this letter sent to all universities currently trying to mandate the COVID shot.
Mandates (and shockingly many of the government-sponsored vaccine ads) go against FTC law regarding deceptive advertising.
Mandates create all sorts of problems with HIPAA (medical-privacy) law – in case you care to see the list of ongoing lawsuits that have arisen when people’s HIPAA rights are violated, you can click here.
Furthermore, coercion tactics are in violation of U.S. and International Law.
The opening frame of the Nuremberg Code — written after WWII to make sure no one is ever again forced to participate in medical interventions without their consent — states this:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
Did you catch that part about: “without … any coercion”?
In actuality, these mandates, and the entire COVID narrative violate all 10 items of the Nuremberg code.
If you want to see what a group of 1,000 lawyers and 10,000 doctors are doing to highlight these issues and begin new crimes-against-humanity trials, you can click here.
The short version: The good guys are punching back.
The bottom line: Mandates and coercion are ILLEGAL.
If your school or employer goes to court and is found guilty of breaking these very-clear laws, they will lose.
Let that sink in … and now let’s talk about how to practically …
Stand up for your rights
Here are two tactics you can consider to help you point this out the problems with mandates:
Good Cop: You could mention this liability issue as a way to show you are looking out for the best interest of your school or employer — i.e. you could be the hero that keeps them out of court, helps craft a respectful policy, and saves them countless dollars in legal battles.
Bad Cop: You could overtly mention litigation and that you would be happy to file a lawsuit if anything happens to you or your peers. This may or may not be good for office politics (or your education/career path), but if you’re in a position of leverage, this may be the fastest way to sway in your organization’s policy.
Before I get to how I might handle peer pressure or medical pressure, permit me a …
Critical thinking interlude
Given the above, I’d argue there are some critically important questions to ask:
Why are our governments literally spending billions of taxpayer dollars to overtly coerce all of us to take these experimental products?
Are they ignorant of the law (seems implausible) or are they actively, knowingly engaged in something illegal?
Why is the White House not quick to point out to businesses that mandates and coercion are against the law?
Why are donuts, cash, or reestablishing pre-covid privileges (like going to a ballpark in NY without a vaccine and sitting where you used to) not at least being frowned up as manipulation, or discrimination, if not overt coercion?
It’s not as if the federal government, and even some states, are being subtle about trying to get everyone to take these “vaccines.”
“The rule is now simple: get vaccinated or wear a mask until you do. The choice is yours.”
I’m not a lawyer, but that sure sounds like coercion, Mr. President!
… and you’re not even being subtle about it.
Shame on you.
You are breaking the Nuremberg code.
You are contributing to the division in this nation.
You are being dismissive of the risks these products carry.
You’re tying our freedoms to compliance with what you think it best.
You are stepping into the middle of a private decision between us and our doctors.
You are unraveling trust in science, medicine, and our government.
When did you become so emboldened as to blatantly violate the law?
Are you actually ignorant of the law, or do you know better and do this anyway?
It makes me wonder if you’re a President … or a puppet.
Side note: I’m saving my thoughts on the wizards behind the curtain for another post about how you can talk me out of my “conspiracy theory.”
For now, here’s the point …
If our federal government can unashamedly break the law, encourage social media titans to censor all dissent, suppress or withhold all non-vaccine treatments, and erode our freedoms, who then is actually looking out for us?
This isn’t a grey area. Mandates and coercion are black-and-white illegal.
Even if you want to get the “vaccine” (fine, that’s your choice), does it not bother you to see what our federal government is doing?
If clear examples of government overreach don’t bother you, I’m guessing (I could be wrong) this is because they have worn you down by taking away so many of your freedoms that you’re willing to make this intellectual compromise just so life can “go back to normal.”
Am I right?
Dear friends, if you think giving up your freedoms has ever resulted in getting them back, you don’t know history.
The only way we take back our freedoms is to fight for them.
As sincerely as I can ask: At what point will you look at the bigger picture and say “OK, this has crossed an unethical line”
What more would have to happen before you say that?
Even if you like the so-called “vaccine,” what is your line in the sand for unethical government overreach, and when will you stand up and do something about it?
OK … interlude over … back to how to effectively push back against pressure to get a “vaccine.”
Find legal help
Given that our leaders aren’t likely to be held accountable or change their tune in the next few months, let’s turn our attention back to the immediately practical.
If I’m in your shoes … and the above didn’t cause your school or employer to (quickly) remove the mandate, or at the very least hastily find an exemption, I’d make sure to kindly submit (in writing) my objection to being forced to take it, and let it be known that if I am forced to do so, or if my employment is threatened, I would have to consider legal action.
If you need help finding an attorney to pushback against your school or employer, here are some resources for you:
Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) – In order to obtain potential legal assistance, email ICAN at firstname.lastname@example.org and provide a copy of the written notice from your school or employer stating that the COVID-19 vaccine is required. You can also see this letter ICAN is sending to all universities mandating vaccines.
America’s Frontline Doctors, Legal Eagle Dream Team (love that name) – has put together fantastic letters you can share with your employer or school to put the fear of God in them by showing them how untenable a vaccine mandate is and the scary volume of liability they would have if they tried to.
Children’s Health Defense – has put together this simple one-page letter explaining the law to any employer or school that attempts to mandate the COVID vaccine.
Health Freedom Defense Fund – They aid families and individuals whose health rights have been infringed and they support legal challenges to unjust laws that undermine our health and freedoms. You can contact them and see a list of resources here. Their legal team can also send Cease-and-Desist letters on your behalf if needed.
For those living in Canada, you might be able to find legal help here.
I’m sure there are other places you can find legal help and letters to submit to your organization (if you know of more please let me know and I will add them), but the above should get you started.
Now let’s turn our attention to …
Dealing with medical or peer pressure
If you are under pressure from anyone in the medical profession to get a covid jab, here are some ways I might handle it.
#1: FIRE YOUR DOCTOR
Doctors work for you, not the other way around.
If a healthcare professional is pressuring you to take the shot, politely (or confrontationally if that’s your style) fire that doctor or nurse and find a new one.
There are plenty of doctors who are happy to protect (and champion) your right to decline the shot.
If your relationship with your doctor (or a friend/peer) is one you want to keep and you’d rather take more of a bridge-building/educational approach, you can pivot to this strategy:
#2: ASK THE UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
As I detailed in my last post, there are so many show-stopper, inconvenient, exposing questions to ask about these “vaccines,” but let me give you the simplest one that is probably all you need.
Ask for a Lab Test to Screen You for Susceptibility to Vaccine Injury
In other words, ask your doctor (or friend) what type of lab tests are available to make sure that your body (or someone with your health condition) is not at risk for having any of the known, heart-wrenching, life-altering injuries detailed in this video from the Informed Consent Action Network.
If you didn’t watch the above video montage yet, please find the time.
Those stories are just a fraction of the ones that the powers-that-be would prefer to sweep under the rug in their unabashed vaccine propaganda.
The point is …
None of the people in the montage above were tested for counter-indications that would have been a red flag for a possible vaccine injury.
Because testing for susceptibility doesn’t happen.
The best “screening” I could find is this laughable, propaganda document from the CDC that basically says unless you have a severe allergic reaction to polyethylene glycol (or your first COVID jab), you should be good to go.
The bottom line: There is no test your doctor can give you to screen you for possible complications.
Let that sink in.
If you don’t believe me, ask for a test.
The pushback you may get …
If you ask the unanswerable question, you’ll likely get the standard, canned reply … “Not to worry, the vaccines are safe and effective, and the risks are one-in-a-million.” (BTW, injuries are way more than one in a million).
In case you get that predictable reply, here’s all you have to do — repeat your question.
Say, “I get it doc, but how do we know MY body is not at risk for becoming injured?”
An honest doctor (or nurse/pharmacist, etc.) will tell you there’s no way to know.
No modestly-informed person, certainly no medical professional, disputes that all medical products carry risks.
Furthermore, is there any medical professional or public-health leader who denies that these shots have injured or killed people?
#3: LET MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS DO SOME REASONING FOR YOU
In case you’re reasoning with someone in the medical profession, let me drive home the unanswerable question with a video interview of three nurses who were devastatingly injured when they got a COVID “vaccine.”
Healthcare workers Shawn Skelton, Angelia Gipson Desselle Kristi Simmonds appear on a recent episode of Del Bigtree’s HighWire. SOURCE: The HighWire with Del Bigtree / Rumble
One of them even said if she had been presented with the “anecdotal” information about all the risks, she would have still gotten the shot.
Do you suppose she thinks differently now?
Do you think she wouldn’t take back her choice in a heartbeat?
These nurses were all “pro-vaccine,” obviously.
They all “trusted the science” and now have been left with injuries that may be lifelong.
How do you know this wouldn’t happen to you?
Is this the time for blind faith, or is it the time for tougher questions?
#4: OTHER INCONVENIENT QUESTIONS YOU CAN ASK
In case you need any other questions to reason with your friends or medical professionals, here are some other talking points to choose from:
Ask when the clinical trials for these “vaccines” ended? Hint: They haven’t. They aren’t schedule to be over until near the end of 2022 or sometime in 2023.
Ask to see the results of the long-term safety studies. Hint: There aren’t any. How could there be?
Ask to see the “package insert.” What’s that? It’s an informative piece of paper that should come with every shot. If you can find one, you can ask questions like:
What does it mean “There is no FDA-approved Covid-19 vaccine?” (p.1), or
Why doesn’t it list “stopping transmission or infection of the ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’” as one of the benefits (p.3)? Hint: that’s because SARS-CoV-2 is the virus – Covid-19 is the symptoms you manifest. Accidental omission? Hardly.
Ask when we’ve ever used an unapproved vaccine (or any vaccine) in the middle of an outbreak. Hint: We never have. Why not? What problems could that cause?
Especially if you’ve already had COVID: Ask when have we ever vaccinated people for a disease they have already overcome? Hint: We never have. Why would we do that now? What risks does that present?
Ask what other medical product has ever been prescribed for every medical condition, every gender, and (almost … they’re working on it) every age? Hint: Not one. So, what makes these products something that is “safe and effective” for everyone, without even adjusting the dosage regardless of how old you are or how much you weigh?
With all that said, let’s step back from logical arguments and get personal.
Dealing with the emotional loss of family, friends, and freedom
Now, you may be thinking, “OK, I get it — the vaccines carry real risks and the mandates are illegal.”
BUT, if I cause a ruckus or say no to the shot, I’m also saying no to seeing my family and friends, I’m likely losing my ability to travel, and I may have to a pick an uncomfortable fight with my work/school, etc.
If that’s you, perhaps this quote from Benjamin Franklin can be of value:
“He who gives up a little freedom to gain a little security, deserves neither and will lose both.”
Yes, your life, and your choices in the near term may get annoyingly, unpalatably disrupted.
Your family may refuse to talk to you.
You may have to find new friends.
You may travel less … for a while.
But, what is better, handing over your freedom and gambling that you won’t get injured, or adjusting your strategy and expectations, finding new friends, and fighting for your freedom.
Which choice will you look back on and say was the right choice?
Here are two things I can tell you:
Given that demand for the COVID jab is plummeting, the propaganda engine is kicking into high gear. The pressure is not going to let up anytime soon. You’re either going to cave, or find your backbone.
You are NOT alone. The truth-loving, science-protecting, freedom fighters are not cowering in their basements. I’ve been encouraged to meet so many of the them (doctors, nurses, scientists, and activists) since writing this post that went viral.
In addition to knowing you’re not alone, be encouraged by looking at the revolutions of history that have overthrown tyranny.
What you find is that there’s a good chance we don’t even need a majority. If (from the estimates I’ve seen) 13-20 percent of us will get loud, organized, and stand up for truth, we win this!
Look, I know it takes courage to stand in the fire.
I know these conversations are uncomfortable, but do you have a better option?
As I said above, once they take our freedom, they won’t give it back.
If we cave in now, there will be more mandates, and more erosion of our freedoms.
Here’s the beautiful thing about speaking truth and asking genuinely-thoughtful questions — there’s no need to be rude, or bombastic; truth just needs to be spoken.
People will recognize truth when they hear it.
Where can you let your voice be heard and stand up for what’s right?
I hope you found this both practically helpful and inspiring.
Don’t be bullied into compromising your integrity and succumbing to an illegal mandate.
The time to stand up for truth is upon us. It may get uncomfortable, but so be it.
For all of you who’ve felt too fearful to speak out, we need you.
Find the courage to stand in the fire and join the fight.
Truth is going win!
LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.
The Strange Case Of NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh’s War Against Everything
By Brad Salzberg/ CAP
Federal New Democratic Party Leader Jagmeet Singh has drawn a connection between anti-lockdown protests and far-right extremism.
“To brazenly not follow public-health guidelines puts people at risk and that is something that we’ve seen with extreme right-wing ideology,” he told reporters.
The fact that Canadians from all walks of life have refrained from adhering to public-health guidelines seems inconsequential to Jagmeet Singh. The attitude remains consistent– if Singh can figure out a way to associate a social issue with racism, he will do so. Such is the “calling card” of Mr. Singh and his fight against nearly every element of Canadian society.
Just this week, Mr. Singh attended a drive-in for an end of Ramadan event in Mississauga with Taranvir Dhaliwal, who works for his brother Gurratan — a provincial NDP MPP.
Captured on video was a violation of Covid regulations on the part of the NDP leader. Neither Singh, nor mainstream media, issued a statement on whether or not this confirmed his dedication to right-wing ideology.
Such is the malarky that emanates from this most curious of federal party leaders. A former lawyer who served as a provincial politician in Ontario,Jagmeet Singh became the first member of a visible minority to lead a national political party in Canada when he won the NDP leadership in 2017.
Neglected at the time was the fact that Mr. Singh was literally parachuted into a Vancouver suburb in order to secure as seat as a member of Parliament. Lacking tangible connection to the riding, within two months of arrival the MP seat had been secured. Perhaps it helped that next to white-minority Richmond,Burnaby is the most 3rd World-oriented riding in Greater Vancouver.
From MP to NDP party leader was another hop, skip and jump. As reported by CBC News, Singh raised 53 per cent of all the money collected by the four candidates. His support was largely drawn from his home region of the Greater Toronto Area, which alone represented two-thirds of his fundraising.
How fascinating this is. For one thing, who knew that community members in the GTA— meaning Sikh stronghold Brampton-– cared so deeply about election results 4000km away in Vancouver?
Such were the sketchy circumstances surrounding Jagmeet Singh’s rise to the top of the NDP Party totem pole. Once he got there, he began to indulge in a hobby shared by PM Justin Trudeau: playing the “race card” against those who ideologically oppose his brand of globalist politics.
In June 2020, Singh was removed from Parliament after refusing to apologize to Bloc Quebecois House Leader Alain Therrien. Mr. Singh called Therrien a racist for denying the approval needed for a motion calling out systemic racism in the RCMP.
Not a speck of contrition was heard from a stiff-necked Singh.“I don’t back down from standing up to racism… I don’t think it benefits for me to call people names, I was angry at the moment and I stand by it,” he said afterward.
The NDP Leader was seeking unanimous consent. He didn’t get it– hence the racism accusation outburst. At this stage of the game, Canadians know all about what Jagmeet Singh stands against. As far as what he stands for, that’s another ball game. Media have little interest. Policy presentation is generally met with a shrug from all sides.
If the Cultural Action Party didn’t know better(we don’t), we might conclude that the purpose of Mr. Singh’s leadership falls outside traditional elements of party leadership. Curious it is that a technically powerless character such as this has on multiple occasions held the fate of Justin Trudeau’s minority government in his hands.
In each case, Trudeau has been bailed out by the NDP. Similar in character, both share a knack for race-card pretensions. Could it be that the Trudeau-Singh relationship is, in fact, a tacit agreement for the maintenance of a globalist ethos?
Put it this way: if Trudeau was playing quarterback for the Great Reset Rough Riders, Jagmeet Singh would be sitting on the bench as a back-up.
Jagmeet Singh’s dedication to Sikh politics in undeniable. As for Canada, the man shares Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s scorn toward the colonial founding of our nation.
What a long, strange trip it has been from the days of a nascent NDP Party founded by Tommy Douglas. A Scottish Canadian who served as Premier of Saskatchewan from 1944 to 1961, Mr. Douglas was leader of the New Democratic Party from 1961 to 1971.
This salt-of-the earth founder of universal medicare would be turning in his grave if he were to witness the transformation within his party.
In fact, CAP is all-in on the idea that Mr. Douglas would consider the circumstances nothing less than a globalist hi-jacking of the NDP Party of Canada.