Freedom Under Siege

[Editor’s Note: The following article on Canada’s Charter of Rights & Freedoms by Gerry T. Neal is essential reading for anyone interested in Canadian political affairs, especially in relation to the current global dilemma now facing not only Canadians but the world at large. Mr. Neal has captured the essence and the history of this controversial document and how it will likely play out in the days and months and years ahead. He clearly shows how it is connected to Canada’s Constitution and moreover his brilliant analysis of its fundamental flaws will give readers a heads up as to why their most cherished of human rights and freedoms document may not be the panacea that Canadians believe it to be when it comes to challenging both Federal and Provincial levels of government over their Orwellian dictates that are now threatening the very superstructure of our once basic freedoms.

This article is also very dear to me as well on a personal level. Having been in a running battle with Canada’s powerful foreign lobbyist censors now for the past 14 years and having incurred and endured their wrath plus the never-ending corporate media slander and maligning that automatically spews forth whenever someone is accused of the alleged crimes that Mr. Neal’s article analyses in great depth in his article, I am greatly indebted to the author for having clarified the overall picture with his cogent and colourful critique. 

Just in my own case alone the lack of any firm legal precedents in the Charter that would have stymied the efforts on the part of the complainants who attacked my name, my person and my profession has cost the Canadian taxpayer close to 2 million dollars of their hard-won earnings and my case is still not settled to this very date.

As Mr. Neal clearly points out, our current Prime Minister “Captain Airhead”, is very fond of creating more and more laws that will protect his benefactors and himself from exposure and his latest ‘PET’ peeve Bill C-10 is one that every thinking Canadian should be very, very concerned about.

One final thing. Mr. Neal’s articles don’t usually include memes such as you’ll see here. The one’s that do accompany his article are my own and for the most part were created over the past 14 years of my struggle to retain our basic human rights.]   

Freedom Under Siege

By

Gerry T. Neal

I have never thought very highly of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms which was added to our constitution in 1982. Note the wording there. The Charter is not itself our constitution but merely a part of it and a late addition at that.  Those who make the mistake of calling the Charter itself our constitution have bought in to the American superstition that a constitution is a piece of paper that keeps a government from going bad through its magical powers.  A constitution is a country’s system of law and government, the institutions that comprise it, and the traditions that inform their motions. The largest part of it is unwritten and this is true even in the American republic. Documents like our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the one the Americans call their Constitution are merely parts of the Canadian and American constitutions respectively. They are the laws that define and set limits to the power of government institutions. They have no power to keep government within those limits apart from the loyalty of those who hold public office in obeying them, the willingness of the courts to uphold them, and the faithful vigilance of the public. 

My low estimation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is not because I don’t like the rights and freedoms that are listed in that document. With a few exceptions, such as the “equality rights” written in Animal Farm style doublespeak in Section 15, these are rights and freedoms that I consider to be among the most valuable elements of our Common Law tradition.   It is rather because the Charter has made these rights and freedoms less secure rather than more. In part this is due to flaws in the Charter itself such as the “notwithstanding clause” in Section 33 and the broad loophole in Section 1 which effectually nullify the Charter as far as the whole point of constitutionally protected rights and freedoms, that is to say that they are supposed to limit what the government can do so as to protect us from the abusive exercise of its powers, goes. The Charter’s loopholes and exceptions protect the government instead of us and for this reason former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney was right to say that it is not worth the paper it is written on. It is also, however, because the Charter has encouraged a way of thinking about our rights and freedoms in a way that is the fundamental opposite of that which has historically belonged to our Common Law and traditional institutions of constitutional monarchy and parliament. It encourages us to think of our rights and freedoms as privileges bestowed upon us by government to be limited or taken away by government freely as it sees fit, rather than our own property. 

The consequences of this way of thinking having become pervasive have been most evident over the course of the last year. Section 2 of the Charter identifies four freedoms as being fundamental. The first of these is freedom of conscience and religion. The third is the freedom of peaceful assembly. The fourth is the freedom of association. The whole point, remember, of having the Charter designate these freedoms as essential is to place limits on government power, to tell the government that it must keep its hands off of these things. Yet ever since the World Health Organization declared the spread of the Wuhan bat flu to be a pandemic last March, our provincial governments have treated these freedoms as if they were completely non-existent, much less fundamental and protected by constitutional law and the Dominion government has constantly been urging the provincial governments to clamp down on us in violation of these freedoms in even more severe ways. 

In 1986 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in the case of R v Oakes.  David Oakes had been arrested with drugs in his possession and under what was then Section 8 of the Narcotics Control Act was presumed to be guilty of trafficking. He challenged the constitutionality of Section 8 on the grounds that it violated the presumption of innocence, a civil right spelled out in Section 11 (d) of the Charter and which had been long established as part of the Common Law tradition. That the provision of the NCA being challenged did indeed violate the civil right in question was easily demonstrated, but the Court then had to decide whether the violation was justifiable under the “reasonable limits” loophole in Section 1 of the Charter. The Court’s ruling established what has ever since been the litmus test for this question. The Court ruled that for a law which violates a Charter right or freedom to be justifiable under the “reasonable limits” clause, it first had to have a “pressing and substantial” goal. Second, it had to meet the three qualifications of a) being “rationally connected” to the goal of the law, b) only impairing the rights and freedoms in question minimally, and c) not overwhelming the benefit hoped to be achieved with its negative effects. 

It is quite obvious that the public health measures fail to meet the second of the three qualifications of the second part of the Supreme Court’s Oakes’ test. When the public health officer tells you that you cannot have any visitors to your home, even if you meet outside, as is currently the case in Manitoba, he is clearly not trying to only “minimally impair” your freedom of association. What he is doing is disregarding freedom of association entirely. The provincial legislature is not allowed to do this constitutionally, nor can it delegate to the public health officer the authority to do so. The legislature cannot delegate what it does not legitimately possess itself. When the public health officer orders churches, synagogues, and mosques not to meet for the largest part of a year, cancels the most important festivals of these religions, and only permits re-opening at a severely reduced capacity that requires churches to betray the tenets of their own faith and turn worshippers away, he is similarly disregarding freedom of conscience and religion rather than making sure that his orders only “minimally impair” this freedom. There is also plenty of evidence that the public health orders fail to meet the third qualification of the Oakes’ test as well. The costs of lockdowns, measured in the destruction of lives due to the breakdown of mental health and the rise in substance abuse and suicides, the erosion of community and social capital, and the devastation of businesses and livelihoods, has been tremendous and far exceeds any questionable benefits of these insane, unjust, evil and oppressive restrictions. Indeed, I believe the case could be made that the public health measures fail every single element of the Oakes’ test. 

The provincial governments have gotten away with all this stercus tauri because they have until fairly recently met with only minimal resistance on the part of the Canadian public. This can be attributed to a number of causes. One of these, of course, is the hysterical and irrational fear generated by the mainstream corporate media that have been deceitfully and despicably portraying a virus that produces no to mild symptoms in most people who contract it, from which the vast majority of people who actually do get sick recover, and which in many if not most jurisdictions has an average age of fatality that is higher than the average expected lifespan of the general public, as if it were the second coming of the bubonic plague. Another cause is the new attitude which has been encouraged among Canadians, especially by the Liberals, since 1982, of regarding our rights and freedoms as privileges bestowed upon us by the government in the Charter rather than what they are, our lawful property as free subjects of the Crown which it is the government’s duty to respect.   

The assault on our freedoms of religion, peaceful assembly, and association have come from the provincial governments. At the same time the second of the four freedoms designated as fundamental in the Charter has come under attack from the Liberals who are in power in the Dominion government. This is the freedom of “thought, belief, opinion and expression”. Whereas our freedoms of religion, peaceful assembly, and association have never been this besieged before in Canadian history, our freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression has taken hits every time the Liberal Party led by a Trudeau has come to power in Ottawa. It has been less than ten years since we finally got rid of one of the vilest elements of Pierre Trudeau’s legacy, the notorious Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.   While the entire Canadian Human Rights Act of 1977 is, in fact, an affront to freedom of thought because, despite its title, it has nothing to do with protecting our rights either as Canadians or human beings from government abuses, but is instead all about prohibiting the crimethink of discrimination on the part of individual Canadians, Section 13 was the Act’s worst provision by far. By defining any electronic communication of information “likely to” expose someone protected against discrimination “to hatred or contempt” as an act of discrimination it in effect forbade all negative criticism of groups protected against discrimination or individuals belonging to such groups, regardless of the truthfulness or justice of the criticism in question.   

Section 13 was finally abolished during the premiership of Stephen Harper thanks to a private member’s bill repealing the foul section that received enough support from Conservative MPs and Liberal MPs of the pre-Trudeau variety – these had not yet been purged from the party – to pass Parliament. Neither Stephen Harper nor his Minister of Multiculturalism, Jason Kenney, who is currently overseeing the throwing of pastors in gaol and the barricading of churches in Alberta, had much to do with this for although they had spoken out against Human Rights Tribunals and their unjust infringement upon freedom of thought and speech on their road to power, in office they betrayed most of what they had once stood for, apparently having sold their souls to get there. The demise of Section 13 has long been lamented by Pierre Trudeau’s son, Captain Airhead, and when he became Prime Minister in 2015 he dropped a number of hints that he would be seeking to revive it. The appeal of Section 13 to Captain Airhead was based on more than just the fact that it had been originally introduced when his father was in power. More than any previous Liberal leader, Captain Airhead has been of the mindset that once a progressive goal has been attained, all debate about it ought to cease. This was evident even before he became Prime Minister when he purged the party of its pro-life members. More than any previous Liberal leader, he has enthusiastically endorsed fringe progressive causes that could not possibly achieve widespread popular support on their own merits without measures that intimidate and suppress dissenters. More than any previous Liberal leader he has been prone to tell Canadians who disagree with him that they are not welcome in their own country. He has used the expression “there is no place for X in Canada” far more liberally than any previous leader and with a much wider range of Xs. (1) In all of this he has demonstrated the sort of sick, censorious, mindset to which something like Section 13 appeals. In December of 2019, after he won re-election in the sense that he managed to squeak out a plurality despite falling majorly in the polls from where he had been four years previously, he instructed his Cabinet that fighting online “hate speech” would be one of their priorities in the new session of Parliament. Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault was specifically charged with finding a way to force social media platforms to remove what the Liberals consider to be “hate speech” within twenty-four hours of being told by the government to do so. This would be Section 13 magnified to the nth degree. 

In response to this directive, Guilbeault came up with a bill that pursued the same goal as Section 13 through a different avenue. Last November he introduced Bill C-10, or “An Act to Amend the Broadcasting Act” into Parliament. This bill if passed would place internet media under the same regulatory authority of the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) as older electronic media such as radio and television broadcasters. By going this route, Guilbeault could maintain that his goal was not to censor what individual Canadians post on the internet, but to ensure that the companies that make shows and movies available through online streaming follow the same Canadian content guidelines as other broadcasters, a goal consistent with his portfolio as Heritage Minister. That having been said, the Bill as originally drafted would have given the CRTC regulatory authority over individual Canadians’ user-generated content on social media. When objections to this were raised the Bill was amended to include an exception for individual user-generated content, but this exception was removed in committee late last month around the same time that the government moved to shut down debate on a motion that the Conservatives had introduced calling for a review of whether or not the bill violated the Charter. None of this inspires much confidence in the Heritage Minister’s claim that the aim of this bill is cultural protectionism and not censorship of thought. On Monday, faced with backlash over all of this, Guilbeault promised that they would make it “crystal clear” that the user-generated content will not be subjected to the same sort of regulatory control as television programming. Needless to say, he ought not to be taken at his word on this.  Indeed, Michael Geist, the law professor at the University of Ottawa who has been one of the foremost critics of Bill C-10, has already said that the amendment the Heritage Committee proposed on Thursday evening fails to follow through on Guilbeault’s promises

It is worth observing here that with Bill C-10, Captain Airhead and Steven Guilbeault have returned to the very first thing the original Trudeau Liberals did to control the minds of Canadians and limit their freedom of thought. At the very beginning of the first Trudeau premiership the Right Honourable John G. Diefenbaker pointed out how the Liberals were threatening freedom of thought through the powers of the CRTC. In a speech entitled “The Twilight of Liberty”, the second included in the collection Those Things We Treasure (Macmillan, 1972), Diefenbaker said: 

The Trudeau Government seems to be dedicated to controlling the thinking of Canadians.   Through the power being exerted by Pierre Juneau, as Chairman of the Canadian Radio and Television Commission, (2) private radio and T.V. station proprietors in Canada are frightened to speak, fearful of being subject to the cancellation of their licences.   One such station was CKPM in Ottawa, which dared to have an open line program critical of the Government.  Pierre Juneau did come before a Committee of the House and he uttered lachrymose words in reply to the criticism leveled at him that he wishes to determine what Canadians shall hear, and to deny them the right to listen to what they will.   His attitude was different when he spoke to the Association of Private Broadcasting Companies and in effect stated: “When I ope my lips, let no dog bark.” Under him the broadcasting network owned by the people of Canada is allowed to broadcast what he permits

Diefenbaker’s warning of decades ago has gone largely unheeded, perhaps because the CRTC’s official raison d’être is cultural protectionism which appeals to a much broader range of Canadians than its more covert purpose of limiting freedom of thought. Certainly right-of-centre Canadians of the more traditional variety, such as Diefenbaker himself or this writer, would have no objections to the idea that Canadian culture ought to remain Canadian. It needs to be pointed out, however, that the CRTC has been a total failure in this regards.  Fifty-three years later, the Canada of 2021 is far more Americanized culturally than the Canada of 1968 was. Indeed, much of what Canadians regard as distinctly “Canadian” culture today, is merely Hollywood culture with a maple leaf stamped on it. Read the novels of Mazo de la Roche and Robertson Davies if you want a taste of the more authentic pre-CRTC Canadian culture.  Since the CRTC failed in its official appointed task, probably because its real purpose was thought control all along, there is hardly grounds here for extending its reach over the new online media. Indeed, the scarcely disguised agenda of censorship and thought control behind the move to so extend its reach, is sufficient reason why this bill, amended or otherwise, must never be allowed to pass. It is also more than sufficient reason for voting the Trudeau Liberals who dreamed it up in the first place out of Parliament and never allowing them to resume power again. For as Rex Murphy  pointed out earlier this week, “What is more galling and more threatening that the bill itself, however, is the set of mind behind it”, and that won’t go away even if the bill itself does. 

SOURCE

Contact Gerry T. Neal at: gerrytneal@hotmail.ca

Footnotes:

(1) Disturbingly, the leaders of the other parties – including the present leader of the Conservatives – have taken to aping his example in this.

(2) The full name of this agency was changed into the awkward and absurd redundancy that it is now in 1976, but the acronym remains the same.


Dr. Hoffe of Lytton B.C. Attacked by Dr. Henry & Interior Health Authority for Exposing Dangers of Experimental Bioweapon Falsely Labelled a “Vaccine”

Dr. Hoffe of Lytton B.C. Attacked by Dr. Henry & Interior Health Authority for Exposing Dangers of Experimental Bioweapon falsely labelled a “Vaccine”

By

Arthur Topham

QCSentinel Reporter

[Editor’s Note: Once again we are witnessing the venomous, draconian actions of the BC NDP government via their servile minions Dr. Henry and the Interior Health Authority (IHA), in this latest blatant attack upon Dr. Hoffe’s integrity and his very livelihood, not to mention the well being of all the local residents of the town of Lytton, BC where the good doctor has dedicated many years of service to the community. 

The unabashed arrogance and power-tripping displayed by these bungling bureaucrats and their political overlords, all of whom are willing participants in what is now recognized universally as being the most virulent attack upon the human race ever witnessed in recorded history, demands that ‘we the people’ expose their actions for what they are and thwarted them in every way possible.

The letter below, issued by the Lytton Medical Clinic on May 4, 2021, provides a general overview of the maliciousness of the NDP traitors when it comes to their deliberate crude and cruel reactionary response to anyone, be they a professional medical practitioner or not, who displays the intestinal fortitude to speak Truth to power as was done by Dr. Hoffe in his original open letter to Dr. Henry.

The Interior Health Authority’s feigned phoney claim that they never received Dr. Hoffe’s vaccine injury report is as repugnant and puerile as anything one might expect from the former Bolshevik Communist regime of the Soviet Union. On top of that it flies in the very face of the IHA’s website logo that overtly and unabashedly claims “Every person matters.” 

Not only Lytton is being affected by the measures Interior Health Authority is instituting. As the graphic further down in the following article shows the other small community of Lillooet is also being downsized and the Lillooet Medical Clinic being shut down as of July 31st, 2021. It begs the question as to whether or not these bureaucratic maneuvers on the part of the NDP government are designed to help or hinder the clear and present danger now facing ALL residents of beautiful British Columbia.

As for the IHA’s words “Every person matters” I trust that Dr. Henry and Premier Horgan and his lackey Farnworth will all be publicly apologizing to the families and victims who they are responsible for murdering and crippling for life .] 

LETTER FROM THE LYTTON MEDICAL CLINIC

Lytton Medical Clinic

4 May, 2021

Community Notice to Lytton, and surrounding area.

Health care changes at St. Bartholomew’s Health Centre, Lytton, BC.

The rollout of the Moderna vaccine in Lytton, which started in mid January 2021, has unfortunately given rise to a very high rate of serious side-effects. Of the initial 900 people vaccinated, ten now have serious ongoing neurological side-effects; (1 in 90). Of these, five now appear to have permanent disabilities as a result of this novel treatment; (1 in 180)

Dr Charles Hoffe, has not been silent about his concern for these people, who received this experimental  vaccine in the belief that it was safe. He has written to those responsible, both at Interior Health, and to Dr Bonnie Henry to voice his concerns.

The vaccine injury reporting forms submitted, appear to have been lost by those involved in the vaccine rollout. Consequently, Interior Health has denied any significant vaccine injuries. These forms are now being resubmitted, (and sent by registered mail), in another attempt to get the authorities to take this matter seriously.

The authorities have sought to silence and discipline Dr Hoffe, for informing the public about this very high rate of  vaccine injury. He is accused of the crime of causing “vaccine hesitancy.”

Dr Hoffe received notification from the Interior Health Authority on the 29 April, 2021, that he would no longer be allowed to work in the St. Bartholomew’s Emergency Room in Lytton, because of his refusal to remain silent regarding the vaccine injuries to the people of Lytton, and the “vaccine hesitancy” that he has therefor caused. 

Despite a sporadic series of Covid infections in the community during the course of this pandemic, no one in Lyttton has required any medical care at St. Bartholomew’s for Covid infections. By contrast, much medical care has been given for vaccine injuries. 

Dr Hoffe is usually on duty as the emergency room physician in Lytton for two weeks out of every month. So his suspension by the Interior Health Authority, is likely to mean that the emergency room in Lytton will be closed for at least two weeks out of every month. 

Dr Glynn Jones, has tendered his resignation from working in Lytton. This will leave a significant gap in physician staffing at St. Bartholomew’s, since there will only be one remaining physician to staff the ER. Locum physicians are very hard to find, but every effort will be made. 

These problems are further exacerbated by the fact Interior Health Authority has also decided to reduce laboratory services in Lytton to 2 days per week. Apart from the negative impact on the quality of health care in Lytton, this will make recruitment of any new physicians extremely difficult.

The Lytton Medical Clinic will attempt to continue as normal.

Sadly, the recent decisions by the Interior Health Authority, have made the delivery of healthcare in Lytton very precarious, substantially reduced and essentially unsustainable.

ORIGINAL FACSIMILE OF LETTER


Dr. Mercola scrubs content from his website after frightening threats

Hello,

Many of you have seen Dr Joe Mercola’s very viral lead story out this week where he details why he is scrubbing much of the info from his website about Covid.

Joe explains he’s had some very bad threats from bad people & organizations, and all of this is true. He also talks extensively about the 12 of us (himself included) singled out in international news (CBS, PBS, ABC, WSJ, NY Times, Newsweek, you name it) for sharing the vast majority of articles on certain controversial subjects to the world. These groups (many funded openly by Bill Gates) are spreading this online and on TV and calling us the #DisinformationDozen, but we’ve rebranded it the Information Dozen as you can see in the graphic below. (That’s me in the top left corner.)

MOST of the 12 of us named have lost at least one platform. Many have lost them in recent weeks, including Bobby Kennedy, who lost nearly a million followers when Instagram took down his page forever. There are only a few of us left standing with any platforms at all.

This campaign against us has been hurtful and actually very frightening, and while I respect Dr Mercola’s decision to remove the content he did, I plan on keeping my articles (and my chin) up, come what may.

I’ll keep you up to date on just what is happening with the 12 of us, so stay tuned.

Speaking of the truth, freedom, and censorship, I want to share this event with you that includes one of those brave 12 warriors (Bobby Kennedy) and it has just launched today.

It’s called Truth Over Fear.

Patrick Coffin is a legend in radio who has been broadcasting to a loyal audience for years. But apparently when he ventured into public health policies, Big Tech had enough, and last weekend they completely took down his online summit mid-launch. 

Last Friday, the Truth Over Fear Summit planned to unleash 40+ presentations from around the world that would have embarrassed some very powerful people. Some of the mind blowing presentations you’ll love include our own friends and a hero to many, Bobby Kennedy, Dr Bob Sears and people many of us have been supporting financially for decades like Barb Loe Fisher NVIC. So…. why don’t they want you to be watching these presenters? What were the videos about? Why don’t they want us asking questions?

Well I’m thrilled to announce they are relaunching this Friday (today!) May 7th through Sunday May 9th. Here’s the full line-up. Please share widely. Watch while you can!

Also, if you’ve already signed up for the series above happening right now, check out our brand new Grow your own, get off the grid, self sufficiency series here! << Limited space so save a seat now!! You’ll learn about foraging food and saving money big time.

Yours in health,

Join me on censorship proof Telegram too where THIRTY thousand + of my readers have come to join our fam! It’s a great new group on an awesome platform that truly believes in free speech! And I can share much with you there as well in greater detail. See you there. Be sure to check out the platforms below that I’m still on for now.

Letters to the Editor

Dear Editor: The COVID operation is not about health

I am writing this message in love and in the interest of sharing information that I now know to be true.

The COVID operation is not about health – and it never has been. It is about totalitarian control. My family is originally from Romania (not me, I was born in Canada) and I have also heard others from Poland and Romania talk about how communism came about in their countries.

It began by closing all the churches. We see that happening now. It also began with censorship, and we see that now as well (read Bill C-10 which has passed its second reading) and we are also hearing more and more about “The Great Reset”, “Build Back Better”, “We’re all in this together”, and lately; more talk about Universal Basic Income (or UBI). These refrains are being uttered world-wide – not just in Canada.

Provinces in Canada are under alleged and made-up health emergencies while unaccountable political figures & unelected health authorities refuse to show truthful, hard scientific data upon which their draconian measures are being implemented & they won’t debate with dissenting medical experts about the fraudulent high threshold PCR testing “case-demic” and artificially inflated mortality.

Churches are being barricaded! Businesses closed! Job loss (being hidden by the CERB & EI extensions moving us gradually into UBI). If UBI passes, which at this point it appears it will; we will lose our homes, pensions, savings & everyone will be put on a monthly amount all over the country. Do you want your children and grandchildren to never own anything? You really think they will be happy? That’s what the Great Reset is about. Please do your homework.

Please, see this for what it is!!!

The injections are NOT vaccines, but they are in fact experimental mRNA or spike protein injections. WE are the test subjects and yet, we cannot work; travel; and very soon go out in public without one. The people making all the money and heavily invested in the vaccine industry are eugenicists. If you don’t believe me, do your homework on Bill Gates. He, Mr. Fauci and others stand to make all the money on the injections and they have NO liability whatsoever. Do you truly think a eugenicist wants to save lives?

I want to have fellowship at my church and I want to be free to worship. While you may not be Christian and this may not matter, I’d still like you to ask the question – Why is it that churches are closed, but liquor stores remain open? Are liquor stores protected under our constitutional law? No, but the churches are; and yet those laws (rights) are being ignored!

I want to keep this short, so I will end it here – but I cannot stress this enough – if you want to live freely, worship freely, have a business, own a home, etc., I pray that you will open your eyes to the truth. May God bless and keep each and everyone of you. I want to make the point that this is NOT about health – we talk about the masks, injections, social distancing – but the real issue is what is happening in the background (laws being passed) while people live in fear of COVID.

Yours truly,

Katie Marwood

Kamloops, B.C.

kmarwood@protonmail.com

Please feel free to contact me if you want supporting documents for what I’ve written.


Quesnel Safeway: Manager Bullies & Threatens Long Time Elder Customer for Refusal to Wear Mask

Quesnel Safeway Store: Manager Bullies & Threatens

Long time  Elder Customer for Refusal to Wear Mask

Interview & Video

By Arthur Topham

QC Sentinel Reporter 

[Editor’s Note: The following interview and video of Albin Stroniarz is important in a number of ways. It clearly shows the attitude of some local business establishments in the City of Quesnel when it comes to the controversial issue of masks. 

There is a general attitude prevalent throughout the Province of B.C. that the wearing of masks in public spaces is an unshakable law that must be followed by everyone regardless of circumstances. This mistaken impression, one fostered by the BC NDP government’s inept methods of advertising the Covid -19 hoax, has left many business owners reacting out of fear and ignorance and in turn downloading their misconceptions onto their customers and treating them with the utmost distain. The example given here involving Safeway Manager “Gloria” is a prime one and just one of many that are occurring daily around the province. 

In the process of putting this article together I tried to get a response from the manager by giving her a note and my business card. To date she has not replied after having been given sufficient time to do so.]  

Interview with Albin Stroniarz

Arthur: So tell me what was going on before you entered the Safeway store and afterwards when you did enter it.

Albin: Well, on Saturday, May 1, 2021 I went down to Quesnel to do my laundry before I attended the Freedom Rally down in LeBourdais Park at noon. I got my coffee at Safeway and that was all good. From there I went to the Rally. That was good. We walked around the downtown core and passed out pamphlets to people and spoke with business owners. It all went well. 

Albin along with members of the Quesnel Freedom Rally Walking around the downtown core of the city delivering pamphlets to interested people and talking with store owners on Saturday, May 1, 2021

After it was over I decided to go back to Safeway again. The Exit Door was left open and I went in and got myself a coffee at the Starbucks stand and left and went back to my pickup truck to have my coffee and a cigar. After that I decided to go back in the store to use the washroom as I had to go badly after walking all over town during the Freedom Rally. Like before I used the Exit Door as it was wide open. When I entered the store again a younger female employee was close by and she said to me “Oh no, you can’t come in through that door. You have to enter through the other entrance door. And where is your mask?”

It reminds one of the old movie “Up the Down Staircase”

I replied to her, “I can’t wear a mask and I’m going to the washroom because I have to pee badly.”

She replied again, “Oh no, you can’t come in through that door.” Again, I replied, “I’m going just to pee, and I walked past her.”

“I walked down the aisle to the back of the store where the washroom is. When I got to where the entrance was to the washroom the store manager “Gloria” was standing there. She said to me, “I heard you talking to the clerk and telling her that you wouldn’t put a mask on. I’m ORDERING you to put one on she yelled! There are free masks at the other entrance.”

I said to her, “I am not interested. I can’t wear a mask and I’m going to pee.”

This is a partial picture of the sign outside the Entrance door to Safeway

She got so upset and said, “I’m going to call the police on you!”

I replied, “Bravo!” and went right past her and back into the warehouse area where the bathroom was and relieved myself. Afterwards I came back out into the store and there was nobody there. I proceeded to go back the way I came in and left by the Exit Door. No one showed up while I was going back to my truck. I jumped into my pickup and backed up to leave. As I was backing up I noticed the store manager had come out to see where I was going. I thought that she was likely wanting to look at my licence plate given that she said she was going to call the police. Of course I live way out of town and the gravel roads are bad at this time of year and my licence plate was covered over with mud so I knew she wouldn’t be able to read it. 

I left the Safeway parking lot and headed for home but when I was turning onto the road that takes me out of town I noticed a police car a couple of vehicles behind me and I thought to myself, “Oh yah, she called the police so they could stop me and tell me I had to put a mask on.” They stayed behind me for a couple of kms and while they were following behind I thought I might have to explain to them why I had refused to put on a mask but then they turned off on to another road and I carried on back to my place.

I thought about the incident in the store and how ridiculous the behaviour of the staff was. It was just beyond me how they treated their customers. I have been shopping at Safeway for years. They have absolutely no obligation to force a person to put on a mask if they are told the person can’t wear one. I told the manager that I can’t wear one and that was that. She should have left me alone. I have very a good reason for why I cannot wear a mask and I haven’t wore one for many many years, well before all this Covid bs started last year, but there’s no way that I should be forced to explain to her the details. It’s none of their business. It’s my freedom of choice and if I’m going to give an explanation for why I cannot wear a mask I only do that with people I trust. I don’t have to tell everybody why and what not.

There is a small market and store out along the Nazko Hwy west of Quesnel where I live called Sylvia’s Cafe. I am now not allowed to shop there any longer either because I refuse to put on a mask. No more stopping to get gas or groceries or a coffee any longer. It’s all so crazy.

On Monday, May 3rd, 2021 I went into Safeway and gave my business card and the above note to a clerk who immediately took it upstairs and gave it to “Gloria” the Manager. I’ve had no response as of the date of publishing this article.

Arthur: One final question Albin. At anytime while you were in the store did either of the two women ask you if you had an exemption when it came to wearing a mask?

Albin: No. Not once did they ask me that.

Arthur: Thank you so much Albin for sharing your story with the QCSentinel. I recall that you were one of the first people to speak out back on March 20, 2021 when the World Wide Rally for Freedom was held around the globe. Being in your 70’s now, in your speech to the crowd at the time you told the audience that you had immigrated to Canada many years ago from Poland and you described to us what life was like there while the country was under the influence of the Soviet Union’s Communist system. I will post your short speech on my site along with your story about Safeway and hopefully viewers and readers will heed the warning that you are giving to Canadians – that we are headed in the wrong direction and the repressive measures now being implemented here in BC and across the country do not bode well for freedom of speech and democracy.

Again, much thanks and appreciation Albin for standing up for your rights. 

Video of Albin Stroniarz Speaking 

at the World Wide Rally for Freedom

Quesnel, BC,March 20, 2021


Murder by Injection: Ch. 4 – Vaccinations

Murder by Injection:

Ch. 4 – Vaccinations

By 

Eustice Mullins

[Editor’s Note]: This post of Chapter 4 of Eustice Mullins’ book titled “Murder by Injection” is an invaluable contribution to the current Covid dialogue in particular the history surrounding the use of vaccines. Mullins was one of America’s great authors and researchers  and possibly the holder of the world record for having spent more time in the Library of Congress than any other writer. His book is the story of the medical conspiracy against the American people by the American Medical Association which, as the author makes clear in his work, is but a subsidiary of the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly that has had a stranglehold over all aspects of public health since the latter half of the 19th Century.

Introduction by the Author: 

The present work, the result of some forty years of investigative research, is a logical progression from my previous books: the expose of the international control of monetary issue and banking practices in the United States; a later work revealing the secret network of organizations through which these alien forces wield political power-the secret committees, foundations, and political parties through which their hidden plans are implemented; and now; to the most vital issue of all, the manner in which these depredations affect the daily lives and health of American citizens. Despite the great power of the hidden rulers, I found that only one group has the power to issue life or death sentences to any American-our nation’s physicians. I discovered that these physicians, despite their great power, were themselves subjected to very strict controls over every aspect of their professional lives. These controls, surprisingly enough, were not wielded by any state or federal agency, although almost every other aspect of American life is now under the absolute control of the bureaucracy. The physicians have their own autocracy, a private trade association, the American Medical Association. This group, which is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, had gradually built up its power until it assumed total control over medical schools and the accreditation of physicians. The trail of these manipulators led me straight to the same lairs of the international conspirators whom I had exposed in previous books. I knew that they had already looted America, reduced its military power to a dangerously low level, and imposed bureaucratic controls on every American. I now discovered that their conspiracies also directly affected the health of every American. This conspiracy has resulted in a documented decline in the health of our citizens. We now rank far down the list of civilized nations in infant mortality and other significant medical statistics. I was able to document the shocking record of these cold-blooded tycoons who not only plan and carry out famines, economic depressions, revolutions and wars, but who also find their greatest profits in their manipulations of our medical care. The cynicism and malice of these conspirators is something beyond the imagination of most Americans. They deliberately mulct our people of millions of dollars each year through ”charitable” organizations and then use these same organizations as key groups to bolster their Medical Monopoly. Fear and intimidation are the basic techniques by which the conspirators maintain their control over all aspects of our health care, as they ruthlessly crush any competitor who challenges their profits. As in other aspects of their ”behavioural control” over the American people, their most constantly used weapon against us is their employment of federal agents and federal agencies to carry out their intrigues. The proof of this operation may be the most disturbing revelation of my work. 

Eustace Mullins’ Book “Murder by Injection”


Chapter 4


Vaccination

One of the few doctors who has dared to speak out against the Medical Monopoly, Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn, dramatized his stand against Modern Medicine by defining it as a Church which has Four Holy Waters. The first of these, he listed as Vaccination. Dr. Mendelsohn termed vaccination “of questionable safety.” However, other doctors have been more explicit. It is notable that the Rockefeller interests have fought throughout the nineteenth century to make these Four Holy Waters compulsory throughout the United States, ignoring all the protests and warnings of their dangers.

Of these four items, which might well be termed the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, because they too are known to bring death and destruction in their wake, the most pernicious in its longterm effects may well be the practice of immunization. This practice goes directly against the discovery of modern holistic medical experts that the body has a natural immune defense against illness. The Church of Modern Medicine claims that we can only be absolved from the peril of infection by the Holy Water of vaccination, injecting into the system a foreign body of infection, which will then perform a Medical Miracle, and will confer life-long immunity, hence the term, “immunization.” The greatest heresy any physician can commit is to voice publicly any doubt of any one of the Four Holy Waters, but the most deeply entrenched in modern medical practice is undoubtedly the numerous vaccination programs. They are also the most consistently profitable operations of the Medical Monopoly. Yet one physician, Dr. Henry R. Bybee, of Norfolk, Virginia, has publicly stated, “My honest opinion is that vaccine is the cause of more disease and suffering than anything I could name. I believe that such diseases as cancer, syphilis, cold sores and many other disease conditions are the direct results of vaccination. Yet, in the state of Virginia, and in many other states, parents are compelled to submit their children to this procedure while the medical profession not only receives its pay for this service, but also makes splendid and prospective patients for the future.”

The present writer well remembers the 1920s, as a child in Virginia, going to school for some weeks without having submitted to the compulsory vaccination ordered by the state authorities. Each morning, the teacher would begin the day’s classes by asking, “Clarence, did you bring your vaccination certificate today?” Obviously, this was the most urgent business of the educational system, taking priority over such matters as lessons and studying. Each morning, I would have to reply, “No, I didn’t bring it today.” The other children would turn and stare at this dangerous classmate, who might infect them all with some terrible disease. My mother had been a registered nurse, and she never urged me to go ahead with my vaccination. I suspect she knew more than the doctors about its possible effects. After postponing the dreaded ordeal for some weeks, I was finally led to the doctor like an animal being led up the plank to be stunned, and I received my injection. Of course it made me extremely ill, as my body fought the infection, but the class was delivered from peril, and I was accepted as a duly branded member of society. In “The Curse of Canaan,” I wrote of the deliverance of our children up for ritual sacrifice, a practice which seemingly ended with the destruction of the Baal cult some five thousand years ago. Unfortunately, the Cult of Baal seems to be firmly entrenched in the present Establishment, which is often known by the sobriquet, the Brotherhood of Death. It is disturbing to see how the educationists eagerly embrace each new offense against children in our schools, railing against any mention of morality or religion, while solemnly indoctrinating six year olds in the advantages of “an alternative life style” in their sexual preferences. The present goal of the National Education Association seems to be that teachers should hand out condoms to the class before beginning each day’s activities.

The urgency of my vaccination was not that there was any epidemic then raging in the city of Roanoke, nor has there been one in the ensuing sixty years. The urgency was that no child shall be spared the ministrations of the Cult of Baal, or forego sacrifice on the altar of the child molesters. The Medical Monopoly cannot afford to have a single pupil escape the monetary offering to be paid for the compulsory vaccination, the tribute of the enslaved to their masters.

From London comes an alarming observation from a practitioner of excellent reputation and long experience. Dr. Herbert Snow, senior surgeon at the Cancer Hospital of London, voiced his concern, “In recent years many men and women in the prime of life have dropped dead suddenly, often after attending a feast or a banquet. I am convinced that some eighty per cent of these deaths are caused by the inoculation or vaccination they have undergone. They are well known to cause grave and permanent disease to the heart. The coroner always hushes it up as ‘natural causes.’ “

You cannot find any such warning in any medical textbook or popular book on health. In fact, this writer was able to locate it in a small volume buried deep in the stacks of the Library of Congress. Yet such an ominous observation from an established medical practitioner should be as widely circulated as possible, if only to be attached by those who can refute its premise. At least it cannot be attacked by the Establishment as quackery, because Dr. Snow is not attempting to sell some substitute for vaccination, but merely warning of its dangers.

Another practitioner, Dr. W. B. Clarke of Indiana, finds that “Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with a least two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”

At last, we have the breakthrough for which the American Cancer Society has been searching, at such great expense, and for so many years. Dr. Clarke has never seen a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person. Is not this a lead which should be explored?

With such an impetus, the ACS could once again get the telephone banks ringing in the fund-raising drives, to initiate positive research as to the possible connection between vaccination and the incidence of cancer. Somehow, we suspect that ACS will not follow this lead. It would also look well etched in stone above the imposing entrance to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, “I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.” However, it is unlikely that the High Priests of Modern Medicine will be able to give up one of the Four Commandments. It will be necessary for an outraged public to bring pressure to bear to abandon the modern ritual of sacrificing our children to Baal in a five thousand year old ritual called, in its modern version, “compulsory immunization.”

In the land where freedom rings, or is supposed to ring, it is even more surprising to find that every citizen is compelled to submit to a compulsory vaccination ritual. Here again, we are speaking of a civilization which is now being visited by two plagues, the plague of cancer and the plague of AIDS, yet compulsory vaccination offers no protection against the plagues which threaten us. It is goodbye whooping cough, goodbye diptheria and hello AIDS. The Medical Monopoly is searching desperately for some type of “immunization” against these plagues, and no doubt will eventually come up with some type of “vaccine” which will be more dreadful than the disease. From the outset, our most distinguished medical experts have proudly informed us that AIDS is incurable, which is hardly the approach we expect from those who demand that we accept their infallibility in all things to do with medicine.

Another well known medical practitioner, Dr. J. M. Peebles of San Francisco, has written a book on vaccine, in which he says, “The vaccination practice, pushed to the front on all occasions by the medical profession through political connivance made compulsory by the state, has not only become the chief menace and the greatest danger to the health of the rising generation, but likewise the crowning outrage upon the personal liberties of the American citizen; compulsory vaccination, poisoning the crimson currents of the human system with brute-extracted lymph under the strange infatuation that it would prevent smallpox, was one of the darkest blots that disfigured the last century.”

Dr. Peebles refers to the fact that cowpox vaccine was one of the more peculiar “inventions or discoveries of the Age of Enlightenment.” However, as I have pointed out in “The Curse of Canaan,” the Age of Enlightenment was merely the latest program of the Cult of Baal and its rituals of child sacrifice, which, in one guise or another, has now been with us for some five thousand years. Because of this goal, the Medical Monopoly is also known as “The Society for Crippling Children.”

Perhaps the most telling comment of Dr. Peebles’ criticism is his reference to “brute-extracted lymph.” Could there be some connection between the injection of this substance and the spread of a hitherto unknown form of cancer, cancer of the lymph glands?

This type of cancer is not only one of the most commonly encountered versions of this disease; it is also one of the most difficult to treat, because it rapidly spreads throughout the entire system. A diagnosis of cancer of the lymph glands now means a virtual death sentence.

If we suppose that physicians such as Dr. Snow and Dr. Peebles are trumpeting nonexistent dangers when they write of vaccination, we have only to look at the court records of many cases around the country. Wyeth Laboratories was the defendant in a case in which a Wichita Kansas jury recently awarded $15 million in damages to an eight year old girl. She incurred permanent brain damage after receiving a diptheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine. Michelle Graham received the immunization at the age of three months, and incurred severe brain damage which left her permanently incapacitated. Her lawyers proved that the damage was solely attributable to the vaccine, although Wyeth’s lawyers attempted to deny this.

Because of the financial prospects, physicians are demanding earlier vaccination for children each year. The Vaccination Committee of the American Academy of Pediatricians recently demanded that the age for children to receive flu vaccine be lowered from the previous twenty-four months to eighteen months. They are promoting a new version of flu vaccine which was said to have been tested on children in Finland.

In an article in Science, March 4, 1977, Jonas and Darrell Salk warn that, “Live virus vaccines against influenza or poliomyelitis may in each instance produce the disease it intended to prevent … the live virus against measles and mumps may produce such side effects as encephalitis (brain damage).”

If vaccines present such a clear and present danger to children who are forced to submit to them, we must examine the forces which demand that they submit. In the United States, vaccines are actively and incessantly promoted as the solution for all infectious diseases by such government agencies as the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in Georgia, by HEW, USPHS, FDA, AMA and WHO. It is of more than passing interest that the federal agencies should be such passionate supporters of compulsory use of vaccines, and that they also should go through the “revolving door” to the big drug firms whose products they have so assiduously promoted, throughout their years of service to the public. It is these federal agents who have drafted the procedures which forced the states to enact compulsory vaccination legislation which had been drafted by the attorneys for the Medical Monopoly, to become “the law of the land.” In the dim reaches of the past, when Americans were more protective of their now-vanishing freedoms, there was sporadic opposition to the threatened outrage which a dictatorial central government sought to impose on every child in the United States. In 1909, the Senate of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts introduced Bill No. 8; “An Act To Prohibit Compulsory Vaccine. Sec. 1. It shall be unlawful for any board of education, board of health, or any public board acting in this state, under political regulations or otherwise, to compel by resolution, order or proceedings of any kind, the vaccination of any child or person of any age, by making vaccination a condition precedent to the attending of any public or private school, either as pupil or teacher.”

No doubt this legislation was drafted by a physician who was well aware of the dangers of vaccination. Even in 1909, the Medical Monopoly was strong enough to bury this bill. It was never submitted for vote. However, the peril of even one state legislature foiling their criminal conspiracy caused the Rockefeller Syndicate to concentrate on perfecting an instrument for controlling each and every state legislature in these United States. This was achieved by setting up the Council of State Governments in Chicago. Its ukases [decrees ed.] are routinely issued to every state legislator, and such is its totalitarian control that not one legislature has ever failed to follow its dictates.

Edward Jenner (1796-1839) “discovered” that cowpox vaccine would supposedly inoculate persons against the eighteenth century scourge of smallpox. In fact, smallpox was already on the wane, and some authorities believe it would have vanished by the end of the century, due to a number of contributing factors. After the use of cowpox vaccine became widespread in England, a smallpox epidemic broke out which killed 22,081 people. The smallpox epidemics became worse each year that the vaccine was used. In 1872, 44,480 people were killed by it. England finally banned the vaccine in 1948, despite the fact that it was one of the most widely heralded “contributions” which that country had made to modern medicine. This action came after many years of compulsory vaccination, during which period those who refused to submit to its dangers were hurried off to jail.

Japan initiated compulsory vaccine in 1872. In 1892, there were 165,774 cases of smallpox there, which resulted in 29,979 deaths.

Japan still enforces compulsory vaccination; however, since it is a militarily occupied nation, its present government can hardly be blamed for submitting to the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly.

Germany also instituted compulsory vaccination. In 1939 (this during the Nazi regime), the diptheria rate increased astronomically to 150,000 cases. Norway, which never instituted compulsory vaccination, had only fifty cases during the same period. Polio has increased 700% in states which have compulsory vaccination. The much quoted writer on medical problems, Morris Beale, who for years edited his informative publication, Capsule News Digest, from Capitol Hill, offered a standing reward during the years from 1954 to 1960 of $30,000, which he would pay to anyone who could prove that the polio vaccine was not a killer and a fraud. There were no takers.

Medical historians have finally come to the reluctant conclusion that the great flu “epidemic” of 1918 was solely attributable to the widespread use of vaccines. It was the first war in which vaccination was compulsory for all servicemen. The Boston Herald reported that forty-seven soldiers had been killed by vaccination in one month. As a result, the military hospitals were filled, not with wounded combat casualties, but with casualties of the vaccine. The epidemic was called “the Spanish Influenza,” a deliberately misleading appellation, which was intended to conceal its origin. This flu epidemic claimed twenty million victims; those who survived it were the ones who had refused the vaccine. In recent years, annual recurring epidemics of flu are called “the Russian Flu.” For some reason, the Russians never protest, perhaps because the Rockefellers make regular trips to Moscow to lay down the party line.

The perils of vaccination were already known. Plain Talk magazine notes that “during the Franco-Prussian War, every German soldier was vaccinated. The result was that 53,288 otherwise healthy men developed smallpox. The death rate was high.”

In what is now known as “the Great Swine Flu Massacre,” the President of the United States, Gerald Ford, was enlisted to persuade the public to undergo a national vaccination campaign. The moving force behind the scheme was a $135 million windfall profit for the major drug manufacturers. They had a “swine flu” vaccine which suspicious pig raisers had refused to touch, fearful it might wipe out their crop. The manufacturers had only tried to get $80 million from the swine breeders; balked in this sale, they turned to the other market, humans. The impetus for the national swine flu vaccine came directly from the Disease Control Center [CDC] in Atlanta, Georgia. Perhaps coincidentally, Jimmy Carter, a member of the Trilateral Commission, was then planning his presidential campaign in Georgia. The incumbent President, Gerald Ford, had all the advantages of a massive bureaucracy to aid him in his election campaign, while the ineffectual and little known Jimmy Carter offered no serious threat in the election. Suddenly, out of Atlanta, came the Center of Disease Control plan for a national immunization campaign against “swine flu.” The fact that there was not a single known case of this flu in the United States did not deter the Medical Monopoly from their scheme. The swine breeders had been shocked by the demonstrations of the vaccine on a few pigs, which had collapsed and died. One can imagine the anxious conferences in the headquarters of the great drug firms, until one bright young man remarked, “Well, if the swine breeders won’t inject it into their animals, our only other market is to inject it into people.”

The Ford sponsored swine flu campaign almost died an early death, when a conscientious public servant, Dr. Anthony Morris, formerly of HEW and then active as director of the Virus Bureau at the Food and Drug Administration, declared that there could be no authentic swine flu vaccine, because there had never been any cases of swine flu on which they could test it. Dr. Morris then went public with his statement that “at no point were the swine flu vaccines effective.” He was promptly fired, but the damage had been done.

The damage control consisted of that great humanitarian, Walter Cronkite, and the President of the United States, combining their forces to come to the rescue of the Medical Monopoly. Walter Cronkite had President Ford appear on his news program to urge the American people to submit to the inoculation with the swine flu vaccine. CBS then or later could never find any reason to air any analysis or scientific critique of the swine flu vaccine, which was identified as containing many toxic poisons, including alien viral protein particles, formaldehyde, residues of chicken and egg embryo substances, sucrose, theimorosal (a derivative of poisonous mercury), polysorbate and some eighty other substances. 

Meanwhile, back at the virus laboratories, after Dr. Anthony Morris has been summarily fired, a special team of workers was rushed in to clean out the four rooms in which he had conducted his scientific tests. The laboratory was filled with animals whose records verified his claims, representing some three years of constant research. All of the animals were immediately destroyed, and Morris’ records were burned. They did not go so far as to sow salt throughout the area, because they believed their job was done.

On April 15, 1976, Congress passed Public Law 94-266, which provided $135 million of taxpayers’ funds to pay for a national swine flu inoculation campaign. HEW was to distribute the vaccine to state and local health agencies on a national basis for inoculation, at no charge. Insurance agencies then went public with their warning that they would not insure drug firms against possible suits from the results of swine flu inoculation, because no studies had been carried out which could predict its effects. It was to foil the insurance companies that CBS had Gerald Ford make his impassioned appeal to 215,000,000 Americans to save themselves while there was still time, and to rush down to the friendly local health department and get the swine flu vaccination, at absolutely no charge. This may have been CBS’ finest hour in its distinguished career of “public service.”

Hardly had the swine flu campaign been completed than the reports of the casualties began to pour in. Within a few months, claims totalling $1.3 billion had been filed by victims who had suffered paralysis from the swine flu vaccine. The medical authorities proved equal to the challenge; they leaped to the defense of the Medical Monopoly by labeling the new epidemic, “Guillain- Barre Syndrome.” There have since been increasing speculations that the ensuing epidemic of AIDS which began shortly after Gerald Ford’s public assurances, was merely a viral variation of the swine flu vaccine. And what of the perpetrator of the Great Swine Flu Massacre, President Gerald Ford? As the logical person to blame for the catastrophe, Ford had to endure a torrent of public criticism, which quite naturally resulted in his defeat for election (he had previously been appointed when the agents of the international drug operations had ushered Richard Nixon out of office). The unknown Jimmy Carter, familiar only to the super secret fellow members in the Trilateral Commission, was swept into office by the outpouring of rage against Gerald Ford. Carter proved to be almost as serious a national disaster as the swine flu epidemic, while Gerald Ford was retired from politics to life. Not only did he lose the election; he was also sentenced to spend his remaining years trudging wearily up and down the hot sandy stretches of the Palm Springs Golf course.

At the annual ACS Science Writers Seminar, Dr. Robert W. Simpson, of Rutgers University, warned that “immunization programs against flu, measles, mumps and polio may actually be seeding humans with RNA to form proviruses which will then become latent cells throughout the body . . . they can then become activated as a variety of diseases including lupus, cancer, rheumatism and arthritis.”

This was a remarkable verification of the earlier warning delivered by Dr. Herbert Snow of London more than fifty years earlier. He had observed that the long-term effects of the vaccine, lodging in the heart or other parts of the body, would eventually result in fatal damage to the heart. The vaccine becomes a time bomb in the system, festering as what are known as “slow viruses,” which may take ten to thirty years to become virulent. When that time arrives, the victim is felled by a fatal onslaught, often with no prior warning, whether it is a heart attack or some other disease.

Health Freedom News, in its July/August 1986 issue, noted that “Vaccine is linked to brain damage. 150 lawsuits pending against DPT vaccine manufacturers, seeking $1.5 billion damages.”

When the present writer was a teenager in Virginia, each summer became a nightmare for anxious parents, as epidemics of poliomyelitis, generally called infantile paralysis, swept the nation. Throughout the summer, we imbibed bottle after bottle of ice cold soda pop to wash down our afternoon snacks of candy bars, with no inkling that we were preparing our systems for the breeding of the polio virus. The most famous victim of polio was the Governor of New York, Franklin D. Roosevelt. In 1931, during the annual polio epidemic, Roosevelt officially endorsed a so-called “immune serum,” a precursor of the polio vaccines of the 1950s. It was sponsored by Dr. Lindsly R. Williams, the son-in-law of the managing partner of the investment bankers, Kidder Peabody. The Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations had urged the building of a new medical edifice to be called the New York Academy of Medicine. As was often the case, they did not provide the funds, but planned the staging campaign whereby the public was induced to contribute millions of dollars for it. Dr. Williams was then appointed director of this Academy, despite the fact that his medical abilities were a joke in New York. Williams used this post to become the apostle of socialized medicine in the United States, a goal which the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly ardently desired, and which was finally achieved when the Medicare program was adopted many years later. In reality, as Dr. Emanuel Josephson pointed out, Williams stood for the political and commercial domination of the medical profession under a socialized system.

Roosevelt then announced his candidacy for the Presidency of the United States, a post for which he seemed physically disqualified. Because of his handicap, he had been unable to stand or walk for many years. He conducted his business from a wheelchair. It seemed incredible that he would be able to wage a national campaign for the office of president. To allay these doubts, Dr. Williams wrote an article which was published in Collier’s magazine, the second largest magazine in the United States at that time. In this article, Dr. Williams certified that Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt was physically and mentally fit to be President of the United States. It was then spread about that a new Cabinet post, Secretary of Health, was to be created especially for Dr. Williams in an upcoming Roosevelt Administration.

The “immune serum” against polio was known to be dangerous and worthless when Roosevelt endorsed it. The National Health Institute of the U.S. Public Health Service had experimented with monkeys for three years, using this identical serum. The Institute stated that a study of the serum had been made on the recommendation of Dr. Simon Flexner, the head of the Institute. The serum was then used, and many children died from it. The New York State Commissioner of Health, Dr. Thomas Parran (who was later appointed Surgeon General of the United States), who owed his appointment to Dr. Williams’ recommendation to Governor Roosevelt, refused to hold hearings to validate the serum, while Roosevelt continued to reap the rewards of “charity” from his Warm Springs Foundation and his annual birthday balls celebrating the polio epidemic.

In 1948, a Dr. Sandier, who was then serving as nutritional expert at the U.S. Veterans Administration Hospital in Oteen, North Carolina, became alarmed at the enormous amounts of heavily sugared drinks, candy and other sweets which were being consumed by children during the hot summer months, at the same time that the polio became epidemic each year. He conducted tests which led him to the conclusion that the children’s consumption of sugar had a direct relation to the virulence of the polio outbreaks. He then issued an urgent warning to parents to ban consumption of any refined sugar product, particularly candy, soft drinks and ice cream during the summer months. The result of Dr. Sandler’s campaign was that the number of polio cases dropped in North Carolina 90% in a single year, from 2,498 in 1948 to only 229 in 1949. Aroused by the effect that Dr. Sandler’s warning campaign had had on their summer sales in North Carolina, the soft drink distributors and the candy manufacturers came in the following year with a statewide promotional campaign, featuring free samples and other promotions. By 1950, the polio toll had risen once more to its 1948 level. What happened to Dr. Sandier? A study of North Carolina publications shows no further mention of him or his program.

Herbert M. Shelton wrote in 1938 in his book, Exploitation of Human Suffering, that “Vaccine is pus—either septic or inert—if inert it will not take—if septic it produces infection.” This explains why some children have to go back and receive a second inoculation, because the first one did not “take”—it was not sufficiently poisonous, and did not infect the body. Shelton says that the inoculations cause sleeping sickness, infantile paralysis, haemoplagia or tetanus.

The Surgeon General of the United States, Leonard Scheele, pointed out to the annual AMA convention in 1955 that “No batch of vaccine can be proven safe before it is given to children.” James R. Shannon of the National Institute of Health declared that “The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used.”

With the advent of Dr. Jonas Salk’s polio vaccine in the 1950s American parents were assured that the problem had been solved, and that their children were now safe. The ensuing suits against the drug manufacturers received little publicity. “David v. Wyeth Labs,” a suit involving Type 3 Sabin Polio Vaccine, was judged in favor of the plaintiff, David. A suit against Lederle Lab involving Orimune Vaccine was settled in 1962 for $10,000. In two cases involving Parke-Davis’ Quadrigen, the product was found to be defective. In 1962, Parke-Davis halted all production of Quadrigen. The medical loner, Dr. William Koch, declared that “The injection of any serum, vaccine, or even penicillin has shown a very marked increase in the incidence of polio, at least by 400%.”

The Center for Disease Control stayed out of sight for some time after the Great Swine Flu Massacre, only to emerge more stridently than ever with a new national scare program on the dangers of another plague, which was named “Legionnaires’ Disease” after an outbreak at the Bellevue Stratford Hotel in Philadelphia. Apparently this virus multiplied in the air conditioning and heating systems of some older hotels in large cities, probably because the vents were never cleaned. In a few isolated instances, it caused death to those who were afflicted. For some reason, these victims were usually elderly Legionnaires, who had attended a gathering at one of these hotels. As the older hotels were gradually replaced by new, more modern motels, Legionnaires Disease quietly faded away, without the Disease Control Center being able to bring off another $135 million coup for the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly.

Polio vaccination has now been accepted as a fact of life by the American public, which derives considerable comfort from the gradual disappearance of the annual scare campaign at the beginning of each summer. . . However, the Washington Post of January 26, 1988 featured a story which created some puzzling afterthoughts. It was announced at a national conference held in Washington that all cases of polio since 1979 had been caused by the polio vaccine. We quote, “In fact, all the cases in America come from the vaccine. The naturally occurring (or wild type) polio virus has not been shown to cause a single case of polio in the United States since 1979.” It was to confront this unpleasant fact that the Institute of Medicine, under contract to the U.S. Public Health Service, had convened a committee in Washington to review the current use of polio vaccine. You thought they would vote to discontinue it, perhaps? This would be a logical conclusion. Unfortunately, logic plays no part in such deliberations. The Post reported that “No radical change is expected. ‘The status quo is very appealing,’ ” said conference chairman Dr. Frederick Robbins, of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland.

This story raises more questions than it answers. It also reveals the wide gap between the medical mind and that of the layman. A layman would say, “If all cases of polio in the United States since 1979 have been caused by the polio vaccine, isn’t this a good reason for discontinuing?” Such reasoning is always called “simplistic” by our overeducated professionals. After all, one has to think of the national economy, and of drug manufacturers geared up to the continuous production of a vaccine for an epidemic which has disappeared. Think of the unemployment, and the diminution of dividends to the holders of stock in the Drug Trust. After all, most of their income is donated to “charity.” If you cannot see the logic of this reasoning, you will never get a job with the U.S. Public Health Service.

SUPPORT the Prince George & Area Freedom Rally

Like colourful blossoms of golden yellow dandilions in the Spring sunshine the Truth Seekers and Freedom Fighters of Prince George, British Columbia are fast emerging from their once snow-covered, frozen Earth to bring forth new signs for the times we’re now living in. 

Their primary purpose in lining the roadways of BC’s hub city of the central north is to visually display and share information and ideas on how to fight the current lockdowns and public health orders that are restricting the personal Rights and Freedoms of Canadians guaranteed to everyone under the Canadian Charter.  

“Covid (as the nascent Facebook Group states), has brought much division with it, this past year. Let’s endeavour to bridge the gaps and be understanding that everyone is at different places in their quest for truth. Be kind, patient and gracious with one another. Feel free to ask questions and share your opinions.” 

Judging from the growing interest that the group has stirred up around the city their peaceful and colourful presentations are having a positive effect. According to one of the Group Moderators Trina Forbes the initiative to begin the weekend rallies was given a kick-start back on April 14, 2021 by local residents Jonathan Misch and Daniel Forbes. In following discussions with Trina about the rallies she told the QC Sentinel that their “first big one was the World Rally day, as well, and we’ve been going full steam ever since. It is really taking off, now the weather has gotten nicer. The police have gone out of their way to tell us we shouldn’t have any trouble from them, in our town… We changed the name of our group from “Prince George” to “Prince George and Area” because we wanted to include as many people as possible.”    

From around 100 people or less in the Facebook group only a couple of weeks ago their numbers have grown to 541 as of the time this article is being published. Last Saturday’s Rally on May 1st had around 150 people attending and the previous Saturday as 100 so the numbers are quickly rising. 

In conversation with other group members I enquired as to whether the local msm in P.G. was giving the group any coverage. The response was, “No media in PG has picked us up, that I’m aware of. I think there may have been some interest back in early March, but not sure as it was never followed up on. Our radio newscasters are so brutal, it’s wear a mask and get vaccinated every half hour on our stations!!! CBC is the worst.”

The messages that the group wishes to share with their fellow citizens are best expressed in their own words and with that in mind I will turn over that part of the article to the sign bearers and wish them all the best in their quest for greater understanding and an end to the injustices now plaguing every community across our great nation, be they tiny towns or the larger urban centres. 

SIGNS OF THE TIMES


Dr Sheppard from the UK. He was there with his dad and spoke at the rally.

A statement from the BC RCMP regarding travel restriction enforcement

A statement from the BC RCMP regarding travel restriction enforcement

B.C.

2021-04-30 16:23 PDT

Earlier this month the BC Provincial Government announced a ban on non-essential travel between three regional zones in British Columbia. This morning they expanded on this announcement by authorizing police to conduct road checks on travel corridors between the regions.

The checks, as outlined in the provincial government announcement, are specifically intended to help limit non-essential travel in order to slow the spread of COVID-19 in our communities. The emphasis will be on informing travellers of the order, identifying whether or not the purpose for travel is essential as listed in the order, and providing every opportunity for travellers to turn around voluntarily. It is anticipated that the vast majority of travellers will voluntarily comply, minimising the need for enforcement.

The BC RCMP is currently in the process of determining where checks will be conducted to ensure public and officer safety.

These checks will be conducted by a dedicated team and will not reduce police service in the communities which we serve. All police personnel and partner agencies taking part in the checks will be following COVID-19 protocols to ensure the safety of everyone.

Signs placed well ahead of the road checks will warn travellers and provide them the opportunity to safely turn around if the purpose of their travel in not essential.

As outlined in the provincial announcement, the BC RCMP will not be conducting random checks of vehicles or persons. Enforcement will only occur at the designated road check locations on Highways #1, #3, #5, and #99 near to the boundaries between the combined Coastal and Fraser Health Regions and the combined Northern and Interior Health Regions. When a road check is active, a notification will also been made on the BC RCMP website and social media channels.

In preparation for the upcoming checks we would ask the public review the restrictions and provisions that the provincial government has issued, and to avoid non-essential travel between the Lower Mainland/Fraser Valley, Vancouver Island, and Northern/Interior regions.

We recognize that these checks will impact traffic flow and could potentially lead to delays. Leading up to the May long weekend we encourage everyone to revisit their plans and limit travel outside of their community. By working together, we will help to slow the spread of COVID-19 and return to normal seasonal travel more quickly.

Chief Superintendent Dave Attfield
Deputy Criminal Operations Officer, Core Policing
BC RCMP

Released by:

BC RCMP Communications
778-290-2929

Fraternitas Rosæ Crucis: The Authentic Rosicrucian Fraternity in the Americas and the Isles of the Sea

[Editor’s Note: The following article is of interest on a number of levels but what I found rather rather poignant is the organization’s position when it comes to the subject of Immunization, a topic currently under fierce debate online given the Covid-19 agenda for jabbing the population of the world in order to kill off millions of misinformed citizens.]

Fraternitas Rosæ Crucis

The Authentic Rosicrucian Fraternity in the Americas and the Isles of the Sea

Welcome to the authentic Rosicrucian Fraternity that was first instituted in Germany in 1614. This Fraternity brought together into one organization the various associations of individuals previously known as the Hermetists, Pythagoreans, Magi , Platonists, Gnostics, Alchemists, and Paracelsians.

The Rosicrucian Fraternity existed in America prior to the First American Revolution. In 1774, the great Council of Three (the Fraternity’s ultimate governing body) was composed of Benjamin Franklin, George Clymer and Thomas Paine. Thomas Paine was later succeeded by Lafayette, who, like Benjamin Franklin, was a member of the Paris Rosicrucian lodge “Humanidad.” In 1842, the Great Council of Three was revitalized by the novelist, George Lippard, who rewrote the exoteric ritual, giving it a patriotic-Christian basis. During the Civil War this Great Council was composed of Paschel Beverly Randolph, General Ethan Allen Hitchcock and Abraham Lincoln.

What is the mission of the Rosicrucian Fraternity?

The Fraternitas Rosae Crucis has two missions or functions, one esoteric and the other exoteric. The esoteric mission is to serve and guide those individuals who are willing to devote themselves to a spiritual life and who are willing to take this sacred vow upon their soul. In other words, the Fraternity offers spiritual teachings to individual members who desire to develop their soul from a “slumbering ember” to a fully conscious spiritual being. The exoteric mission is to disseminate spiritual and scientific truths for the betterment of the physical, moral and intellectual condition of all humanity. The Fraternity’s mission is dual- an outer work directed toward the betterment of humanity and an inner work concerning the development of the individual soul.

What are the fundamental teachings of the Rosicrucian Fraternity?

The Fraternitas Rosae Crucis teaches that there is one God, the Creator and source of all. That within each of us is buried a particle of the Divine element, a Divine Spark, of and from God. This celestial spark is our soul. Furthermore, God gave us the gift of free will and the opportunity to either diminish or grow this tiny spark by our mode of life; by our thoughts, desires and actions. To develop this celestial soul spark, we must transmute (change) our lower nature and increase the feeling of love within our being. The end result of our efforts is to build this soul spark into a glorious, conscious Soul that forms a direct link between the individual and God. This state of spiritual development is termed Soul Consciousness or Soul Illumination. Illumination of the Soul is symbolized by the fully bloomed rose in the center of the cross of transmutation, the Rosy Cross. The mission of the Fraternitas Rosæ Crucis is to guide individuals, one by one, on the Path toward the ultimate of their Divine Inheritance, Soul Consciousness followed by God Consciousness.

What is the character of a dedicated student of the Rosicrucian Fraternity?

He or she, is one who, because of their physical, mental and spiritual attainment, is considered qualified as a member of the esoteric Rosicrucian Fraternity. The true Neophyte in the Fraternity is first of all a seeker after wisdom and an aspirant after the deepest truths knowable to humankind. This wisdom is not sought for selfish purposes, but to enable the individual to better help their fellow mortals; to better qualify the Neophyte to serve God and humanity, and thus be better able to aid their fellow humans in their struggle to raise themselves to higher levels.

To help you to further understand just what the Rosicrucian Fraternity is, it might help to tell you what it is not. It is not a social lodge or organization. Although students do have an opportunity to gather on Beverly Hall grounds during teaching sessions called Convocations, these meetings are for the spiritual development of the individual and not for sociability. Nor is it only a center for the distribution of ancient mystic knowledge. Although it does do this, but only in so far as it helps the student’s own personal Spiritual development. Likewise, it does not confer spiritual degrees on its students by ritual alone. Such rituals are only valid when they merely confirm a state of Spiritual growth that the student has already earned by his or her own personal efforts.

If you desire further understanding of underlying philosophy and Arcane Teachings of this Ancient Spiritual Fraternity then click the link below or the Teachings tab above.

Go to Arcane Teachings

The Church of Illumination 

Tenet on Vaccination and Immunization

Introduction and Historical Background

The Church of Illumination espouses a long historic doctrine on both the physical and spiritual dangers of vaccination and immunization. Reverend Reuben Swinburne Clymer M.D. and Alexander Wilder M.D. were founding members of the Church of Illumination. Both adamantly voiced the Church’s tenet on immunization and its attendant consequence of spiritual harm, which they termed blood pollution.

Dr. Wilder firmly embraced the spiritual conviction that we are created in the image of God, by God, and being Holy and Sacred, our person should not be defiled or polluted; that the medical practice of attempting to prevent or cure diseases by means of injecting or transmitting “vile animal serums” was wholly against the Divine Law. This concept was in full harmony with the teachings of the Church and the Biblical injunction “to seek the kingdom of heaven” and to “become the Sons and Daughters of God,” free from all evil. As a result of his strong convictions, Dr. Wilder founded the first anti-vaccination society in the United States in the late 1800’s. (More information on Dr. Wilder can be found here).

Dr. Clymer was Director General of the Church from 1905 to his death in 1966. Following the footsteps of Dr. Wilder, in 1904, he authored his first text on this subject, Vaccination Brought Home to You. He further reiterated the Church’s tenet that immunizations are a form of spiritual blood pollution in The Book of Rosicrucaie, Volume II (1947) and the now out of print book, Age of Treason (1957).

Reverend Emerson M. Clymer held the position of Director the Church of Illumination from 1966 to his death in 1983. Rev. Clymer also assumed the office of president of the Humanitarian Society, an outreach program of the Church established to educate the public concerning both spiritual and health related topics. He edited and co-authored the book, The Gifts of the Spirit, The Doctor Within (1976) and was editor of The Dangers of Immunization (1979). The spiritual and potential physical dangers of immunizations outlined in these two books were further expanded in the book, Vaccination and Immune Malfunction, by Harold E. Buttram M.D. and John Chriss Hoffman (1987). All of these books are printed and published by the Philosophical Company, which has been the printing establishment and repository for the Church literature since 1902.

The Tenet:

Prohibition Against Vaccination/Immunization

The Bible teaches that the body is the temple of the God:

“Do you not know that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? And whoever defiles the temple of God, God will destroy; for the temple of God is holy, and that temple is you,” (1 Corinthians 3:16-17).

The Bible also informs us that our spiritual mission on earth is to develop (regenerate) our soul and become at one with God:

“And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel,” (Matthew 19:28).

“But those who received him, to them he gave power to become sons of God, especially to those who believed in his name,” (John 1:12).

The Church teaches that the Soul is the Light or the divine image of God. The body is the house of the soul-spark and can become the temple of God, wherein the spiritualized (regenerated) Soul can dwell. To achieve this spiritualized state, individuals must harmonize their thoughts and actions with God’s Divine Law and keep the body sufficiently pure.

The Church of Illumination further affirms that immunizations are a form of blood and body pollution, which defiles the purity of the body:

“You shall not pollute the land in which you live, for blood pollutes the land, and no atonement can be made for the land for the blood that is shed in it, except by the blood of the one who shed it. You shall not defile the land in which you live, in the midst of which I dwell, for I the Lord dwell in the midst of the people of Israel,” (Numbers 35:33-34).

The Church spiritually interprets “land” as both a physical land (exoteric interpretation) and also symbolic of human body that is to become purified and undefiled (esoteric interpretation).

The fundamental tenet of the Church of Illumination is the Immortalization of the individual soul (the divine spark) within the temple of the body. This spark, a germ of God, is the potential Christos, or Light of Soul Illumination and can be developed by the conscious effort of each individual. Each individual is a nucleus of Light, a Temple or Church for the living, radiating Christ.

The Church teaches that the body is a spiritual structure wherein the spiritual sun shall constantly shine and that this body, if properly cared for, is its own best “doctor within.” The Church furthermore teaches that it is our spiritual responsibility and duty to keep our bodies clean and pure, as it is a temple for our soul that dwells within it. The teachings of the Church unequivocally affirm that injections of vaccines and inoculations are a violation of these biblical teachings as they are a form of blood pollution, defiling and polluting the body (spiritual temple). Immunizations and vaccinations are a form of blood pollution because they have devastating effects on the regeneration of the soul that each Church member seeks to attain.

Go to Tenets of the Church of Illumination.

Description

It remains for future generations to fully recognize and record the consequences of what in truth is an ongoing scientific experiment. At the present time approximately one third of America’s children are afflicted with autism, learning disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity syndrome (ADHD), allergies, and/or asthma, all of which were rare or uncommon three or four generations ago. Due to gross deficiencies in vaccine safety tests, documented during US Congressional hearings on vaccine safety (1999-Dec. 2004), there is as yet no direct proof of vaccine-causation, but there is overwhelming circumstantial evidence, reviewed in this book, of vaccine-causation of current deteriorating health patterns among our youngsters, which is or should be considered the leading threat to America’s future and well-being. 

  • 124 pages
  • Author: Dr. Harold Buttram
  • Book Type: Paperback

Description

The Immune Trio explains the dangers of vaccine immunization, including immune malfunction and genetic mutation.

  • 192 pages
  • Author: Fifth edition by Harold Buttram, M. D. and John Hoffman, Ph. D.