Lawyers and Medical Experts worldwide say they have all the evidence they need to convict WHO, CDC, PHE, Bill Gates and World Leaders of ‘Crimes against Humanity’

Lawyers and Medical Experts worldwide say they have all the evidence they need to convict WHO, CDC, PHE, Bill Gates and World Leaders of ‘Crimes against Humanity’


Legal proceedings have begun worldwide against various authorities, institutions and world leaders including the WHO, CDC, PHE, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and so on and so on, for committing Covid fraud, crimes against humanity and genocide, and every single lawyer and medical expert proceeding with the prosecutions say they have the evidence they need to ensure convictions.

Since July 2020 the Corona Investigative Committee in Germany has taken testimony from a large number of international scientists and experts.

The committee led by Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, have since concluded the following –

  • The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal”
  • It is:
    • The biggest tort case ever
    • The greatest crime against humanity ever committed
  • Those responsible must be:
    • Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity
    • Sued for civil damages
  • Deaths
    • There is no excess mortality in any country
    • Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu
    • 94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems
    • Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19
    • Autopsies showed:
      • Fatalities almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions
      • Almost all deaths were very old people
      • Sweden (no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statistics
    • US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statistics
  • • Health
    • Hospitals remain empty and some face bankruptcy
    • Populations have T-cell immunity from previous influenza waves
    • Herd immunity needs only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved
    • Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious
  • Tests:
    • Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic
    • Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive
    • Likelihood of false-positives is 89-94% or near certainty
    • Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China
    • The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections
    • PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections
    • A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found
    • Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cycles
  • Illegality:
    • The German government locked down, imposed social-distancing/ mask-wearing on the basis of a single opinion
    • The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating
    • The lockdowns were based on non-existent infections
    • Former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the corona measures
    • Former UK supreme court judge Lord Sumption concluded there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for corona measures
    • German RKI (CDC equivalent) recommended no autopsies be performed
    • Corona measures have no sufficient factual or legal basis, are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately
    • No serious scientist gives any validity to the infamous Neil Ferguson’s false computer models warning of millions of deaths
    • Mainstream media completely failed to report the true facts of the so-called pandemic
  • Democracy is in danger of being replaced by Communist totalitarian models
  • Drosten (of PCR test), Tedros of WHO, and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code
  • Politicians can avoid going down with the charlatans and criminals by starting the long overdue public scientific discussion
  • Conspiracy:
    • Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic
    • Children were calculatedly made to feel responsible “for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow Corona rules”
    • The hopeless PCR test is used to create fear and not to diagnose
    • There can be no talk of a second wave
  • Injury and damage:
    • Evidence of gigantic health and economic damage to populations
    • Anti-corona measures have:
      • Killed innumerable people
      • Destroyed countless companies and individuals worldwide
    • Children are being taken away from their parents
    • Children are traumatized en masse
  • Bankruptcies are expected in small- and medium-sized businesses
  • Redress:
    • A class action lawsuit must be filed in the USA or Canada, with all affected parties worldwide having the opportunity to join
    • Companies and self-employed people must be compensated for damages.

These conclusions have been reached thanks to the testimony and evidence submitted by experts in every field of science to the committee which undeniably prove the Covid-19 pandemic is a planned criminal operation.

And it is thanks to these testimonies and submitted evidence that thousands of lawyers and medical professionals worldwide now have all the evidence they need to convict the World Health Organisation, the CDC, Public Health England, SAGE, and World leaders for Covid fraud, crimes against humanity and genocide.

One such court case has already been granted permission to proceed in the Supreme Court and will take place in Ontario, Canada. The official court proceeding document can be found here. This case would not have been granted if it was not for the mass evidence that has been gathered by Dr Reiner Fuellmich and his team on the Corona Investigative Committee.

The legal proceedings that have commenced in the Superior Court of Justice in Canada are against –


This is of course just the beginning as many more legal proceedings are currently being requested to take place across the world.


Press Release: The Canadian Frontline Nurses Announce Their Open Letter

Press Release: The Canadian Frontline Nurses Announce Their Open Letter

Liberty Coalition Canada


May 16, 2021

Please read and share this urgent declaration from a broad and diverse group of Canadian nurses who sent this out to the Colleges of Nurses of our various Provinces and Territories and to the Public at large, whom they serve.

‘In December 2020, Ontario’s College of Nurses (CNO), the governing college, issued a statement to its nurses.

The CNO sent this letter to its members to ensure their expectations were being met when it comes to adhering to public health protection measures. The letter issued a statement forbidding nurses from freely questioning any or all official measures being imposed in response to Covid-19.

The CNO then went on to threaten nurses with punishment – investigations and disciplinary action.

We regard this recent statement of the CNO to be unethical, anti-science and deeply disturbing. As nurses, our primary duty of care is not to the CNO or any other authority, but to the patients we care for. When we became nurses, we made a personal promise to ourselves to always put our patients first and that our ethical and professional duty is always first toward the patients under our care. We have a moral and ethical duty to follow our 4 ethical principles of; benevolence, non-maleficence, justice and autonomy, which supersedes all policies made. The CNO statement, orders us to violate our duty and pledge to our patients in the following ways:

1. Denial of the Scientific Method itself: The CNO is ordering nurses to put aside the scientific method and to not debate or question the processes and conclusions of science.

We nurses know and continue to believe that throughout history, opposing views, vigorous debate and openness to new ideas have been the bedrock of scientific progress. Any major advance in science has been arrived at by being allowed to question “official” narratives and following a different path in the pursuit of truth.

2. Violation of our Code of Conducts: By ordering us not to debate and not to question, the CNO is also asking us to violate our own code of conduct. This code of conduct was put in place to protect the public and covers six main principles:

The Code consists of six principles:

• Nurses respect the dignity of patients and treat them as individuals

• Nurses work together to promote patient well-being

• Nurses maintain patients’ trust by providing safe and competent care

• Nurses work respectfully with colleagues to best meet patients’ needs

• Nurses act with integrity to maintain patients’ trust

• Nurses maintain public confidence in the nursing profession

As nurses, being allowed to question and have open debate, allows us to advocate for patient’s individual care needs. By stifling nurses this only gives our patients limited or no care options, therefore removing medical freedom. These principles and statements define the values and principles nurses use to fulfill their professional obligations.

The CNO statement orders nurses to not discuss or communicate with the public any measures currently in place. This prevents nurses from being the leaders we are called to be. As per CNO guidelines “All nurses, regardless of role or title, are leaders. Nurses lead every single day in all practice settings.” Nurses lead when they:

Advocate for patients. From advocating for a patient’s specific care goals to speaking up for vulnerable patients who may be in danger, nurses look out for their patients.

Identify risks to patient safety. Nurses put patients first, even when it’s challenging to do so.

Advocate for quality practice settings. Nurses work as a team to create policy changes when necessary to support safe patient care.

Share their knowledge. Nurses collaborate with other care providers, including students and those who are new to the profession or practice setting.

3. Violation of Duty of Informed Consent: The CNO is also ordering nurses to violate the sacred duty of informed consent – which is the process by which the patient/public is fully informed of the risks, benefits and any alternatives to the treatment or intervention, before consent is given. As per CNO, nurses have ethical and legal obligations for obtaining consent. At this time nurses are not meeting their obligations in all health care settings. Alternative resources need to be freely available for our patients, in order to make fully informed decisions regarding their health; medical transparency is now removed.

Furthermore, The RNAO recently published a media release dated May 7, 2021 with a message to Premier Ford and his government to immediately ensure all nurses are fully vaccinated with respect to Covid-19. A decision as to whether or not an injection be made mandatory should never be made. Nurses can’t be put in a position where we lose the ability to advocate for ourselves, if this is taken away from us how are we to be expected to advocate for our patients.

We nurses believe that with the CNO statement dated December, 2020 a seminal moment in the assault on free speech and scientific inquiry has been reached.

By ordering nurses to be silent and follow only one narrative, or else face discipline and censure, the CNO is asking us to violate our conscience, our professional ethics, and the scientific pursuit of truth.

We will never comply and will always put our patients first.

The CNO must immediately withdraw and rescind its statement of December, 2020.

We also give notice to other Canadian and international licensing authorities for nurses and allied professions that the stifling of scientific inquiry and any order to violate our conscience and professional pledge to our patients, itself may constitute a crime against humanity.

As stated by the CNO “Patient safety is a collective responsibility. As the nursing regulator in Ontario, we share responsibility for keeping patients safe, and we need your help to do so.” We now need your help, we encourage citizens to also hold CNO accountable to do their job to keep you safe by allowing freedom of speech, informed consent, medical freedom and transparency.

We are your Ontario nurses. Taking a stand for you! Will you take a stand for us?

College of Nurses statement regarding expectations related to public health measures

Public health protection measures, such as handwashing, masking, and social distancing are effective strategies to prevent the spread of COVID-19. With the imminent rollout of COVID-19 vaccines in Canada, CNO is taking this opportunity to make its expectations about providing advice on evidence-based public health protection and prevention measures clear to nurses in Ontario.

CNO’s statement

Nurses are leaders in the community and the public’s trust in nurses may extend to their views on health matters communicated on social media and other forums. Statements made by nurses in public forums have the potential to impact the health and safety of the public.

Nurses have a professional accountability to:

use accurate sources of information based in scientific theory and evidence, to inform their professional service and practice[1] 

support patients and the public to make informed health care decisions, including decisions about public health prevention and protection measures[2] 

role model and follow public health directives that keep patients and the public safe[3].

CNO’s expectations are outlined in the Code of Conduct and Professional Standards.

CNO’s practice standards do not apply to all aspects of a nurse’s private life. However, when a nurse communicates with the public and identifies as a nurse, they invoke their professional position as a nurse and are accountable to CNO and the public it protects.

Nurses are expected to adhere to the standards of practice in carrying out their professional responsibilities. Nurses have a professional responsibility to not publicly communicate anti-vaccination, anti-masking and anti-distancing statements that contradict the available scientific evidence. Doing so may result in an investigation by CNO, and disciplinary proceedings when warranted.’

Read and sign the declaration 


Listen to updates from Liberty Coalition Canada on the go!

Subscribe to the Liberty Dispatch Podcast.

Also available on Google, iTunes, and Spotify.

Sign our petition to End Lockdowns 

Slovakia Report: Covid “Tests” Contaminated With Nanotech Hydrogels And Lithium

Dr. Ariyana Love

A newly released Slovakian report reveals that “covid tests” are contaminated with nanotech hydrogels and lithium. Lithium is used in the lipid compound coating nanobots which are inserted into the hydrogels for ballistic delivery of biological agents.

The lipid coating is used to trick and bypass your God-given immune system with the nanobots that contain a deadly Gain-of-Funtion spike protein. This lab enhanced spike protein is a weaponized pathogen with a DNA payload that gets deposited directly into human cells.

Nanotech hydrogels were created for ballistic delivery of vaccines but frontline medical experts now agree these are self-replicating Biological weapons. The experts have also called for the vaxxed to be quarantined.

The so-called “covid tests” contain big pharma’s unapproved medical experiment. I wrote about this in detail here: Masks And Covid Tests Contain Nanotech Vaccines Without Informed Consent. Each time you let them swab your nasopharyngeal cavity you are subjecting yourself to a dangerous biological experiment without your Informed Consent. This is an act of terrorism. These Bioweapons easily pass the blood/brain barrier and enter your brain. The swabs are deliberately being contaminated and we must get to the bottom of who’s manufacturing these weapons of war. The human species is under biological attack. The public has been lied to from the start and bar none, this is the greatest conspiracy of all time!

Mark Sexton is an ex-police official in the UK who went public with the Slovakian report knowing full-well that mainstream media won’t touch the story. Mr. Sexton is pleading with the worldwide public to take the PCR “test kits” to your local police station and remove the so-called “tests” from circulation at once.

Keep in mind there are children in the UK inserting these medical devices up their noses 3-4 times per week and many countries are mandating “testing” in schools.

Slovakia Report: PCR “Tests” Used As Act Of BioTerrorism

Nanotech Hydrogels

Dr. Carrie Madej was the first expert to open up a public discussion on the nanotech hydrogels. In her most recent interview Dr. Madej takes us through a Powerpoint presentation on mRNA pharmaceuticals, hydrogels for gene delivery, DNA mutation, immune health, synthetic coding and long-term potentials of genetically modifying the human species through the Covid-19 shots, swabs and masks.

In the Brighteon interview with The New American, Dr. Madej explains in detail how nanobots are being tested on humans like lab rats, delivering drug and chemical payloads, explosives, toxins and gene editing technologies without Informed Consent. DARPA has a huge role in developing these Biotech weapons which are permanently altering the human genome and genetically modifying the human species into hybrids, part artificial and part human which allows for branding, ownership and external control over body, mind and emotions.

Moderna’s Operating System will allow for humans to be connected and controlled by a singular AI computer which the entire Internet is already on. Attached to the hydrogels is a DNA sequence to a drug/chemical payload. The synthetic hydrogels are self-replicating and that means the alien (unidentified) DNA and RNA is being fused with your own tissue and altering irreversibly what it means to be human. This artificial substance grows inside your body in a biosynthesis of inorganic nanomaterials using microbial cells or bacteriophages. Millions of foreign proteins are being synthesized into the bodies of the vaxxed as we speak. The nanobots can also disassemble from the nanotube, reassemble, build and reproduce on their own inside your body.

Nanobots also generate their own electricity. They’re able to use your own energy like a battery, converting your heat (energy) into electricity. It even uses your brain data while you’re sleeping, like a parasite to its host.

Nanobots and hydrogels are an “on demand delivery system” targeting your bodies cells with the a DNA payload. Hydrogels are biosensors which work tirelessly with external electronics, forwarding your biometric data to the AI. This new operating system is patented for cryptocurrency exchanges using the human body. This is the ultimate intrusion of your bodies cells, personal thoughts and your bodily autonomy which is 100% breached with this biohacking technology that’s making people part synthetic. The vaxxed are therefore already themselves patented.

Rejections and Allergic Reactions to the lipid-nanotech coating on hydrogels are causing anaphylactic shock, seizures and deaths. The spike protein being inserted and coded into human cells is also the chief cause of blood coagulation which leads to rapid blood clotting.

Dr. Madej has confirmed that these Biotech weapons are also being delivered through nasopharyngeal penetration via the PCR “testing kits”. The drug and chemical payloads carried by the nanoparticles are delivered via carbon nanotube hydrogels, as I documented previously. Media reports have also revealed that graphene fibers have been found in most masks which are contaminating the respiratory pathways of wearers (including children) and delivering the payload into the body.

Ethylene oxide, an off-gasing poison not approved by the EU or US regulators is also being sprayed on covid masks and swabs. Again, we must get to the bottom of who’s responsible for this.

Scientific lab research conducted by Mike Adams from Natural News, produced photographic evidence that the covid “test kits” and China-made masks are indeed INFESTING the lungs with tiny particles. Mr. Adams released 40+ lab photos of covid swabs and masks and proved they do indeed contain mysterious red and blue fibers. Some of these fibers have hooks or “grippers,” and appear to be designed to latch onto soft tissue, something not found in natural fibers. The grippers are consistent with the nanotech hydrogels and carbon nanotubes (nanoworms) which are designed to attach themselves to tissue inside the body and wait for external command by classified EMF frequency.

Pic: Natural News carbon nanotube hydrogel with gripper

When exposed to UV light, strange sparkles come off the synthetic swab strands. This is consistent with carbon nanotube hydrogels which are semi-conductors. The swab fibers are bio-luminescent because they are producing their own light and electricity.

Mr. Adams explains in more detail about the inorganic fibers he found in his Brighteon podcast here.

Are these the same fluorescent worm-like Micelles developed and patented for drug delivery, as published in PubMed.Gov?

A new peer-reviewed study in the scientific journal Water Research just called for a full investigation into face masks as it raises serious questions about their safety for daily use and their impact on the environment.

We are under a biological attack. The genetic hybridization of humans will ultimately lead to our rapid extinction according to Biotech whistleblowers such as Geert Vanden Bossche and Dr. Michael Yeadon and leading Immunologist Professor Dolores Cahill. If we do not stand united and resist we are facing not only worldwide depopulation but also the total enslavement of the human species through genetic engineering and transmutation.


We need to stop using masks and take all covid “test kits” to our local police stations. The medical system has failed us. The central banks are enslaving us and driving us to a totalitarian worldwide take-over. We have to take our power back and withdraw from their evil system, altogether. If everybody withdrew their money from the banks and stopped paying taxes to our treasonous governments it would be entirely lawful. This is how we withdraw our consent. We have no other choice. Either we become enslaved at the genetic level, transhumanized and depopulated or we say “fuck the system” and rely on ourselves. We must unite with our neighbours and set up a system for the barter and trade of goods and services just as we did for thousands of years in the past, quite successfully.

All government’s who partook in this fraud are now being sued by World Freedom Alliance for Crimes Against Humanity. The greatest Nuremberg of all time is underway, Nuremberg Two and governments have been served with Notices of Liability. The eugenicist “elites” can’t stop what’s coming for them even though they’re trying like hell to reduce the population and reset history in order to hide their crimes.


None are as hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free. The Truth has been kept from the depth of their Minds by Masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrong looks like right in their eyes.

Johann Wolfgang Goethe

Zombie Apocalypse: Nurse Klanmother Karen Lucyk MacDonald

Editor’s Note: Sorry but I can’t embed the videos on my site. Click on the urls.

Part 1

Scientific Demonstration of Vaxxed persons assaults on unvaccinated for Life Energy – Zombie Apocalypse: Nurse Klanmother Karen Lucyk MacDonald

Part 2

“Vaccine” rna/dna bioweapon Nanowars: Nurse Klanmother Karen Lucyk MacDonald & Tony Pantalleresco

The Politics of Language: Propaganda, Truth & Justice – A Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel Special 3-Part Series (Part 3)

The Politics of Language: Propaganda, Truth & Justice  

A Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel Special 3-Part Series 

(Part 3)


Arthur Topham


The Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel

May 23, 2021 

[Editor’s Note: As I was putting together Part 3 it quickly became apparent that my initial plan for a 3-Part series was not going to manifest in the way I had originally envisioned it. I ought to have known, from past experience, that to attempt such a feat in three relatively short articles would be next to impossible. Books of great length have appeared over the years that deal with the same subject matter that I’m attempting to cover in these brief essays. One of more recent ones, ironically, appeared back in 2012 during the same year in which the forces now under scrutiny in this 3-Part series were responsible for the major attack upon my person and my publishing business via the use of Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” legislation as contained in Sec. 318 – 320 of the Criminal Code of Canada. The title of the book was “The Myth of German Villainy” and the author Benton L. Bradberry. The book is a storehouse of factual information relating to the real history behind the manufactured image of Germany as the most vile, evil nation that ever graced the pages of recorded history. I would highly recommend it to anyone wishing to understand why Germany, a nation of hardworking, honest, forthright and spiritually robust people, ended up becoming, in the eyes of future generations the ultimate pariah nation in the world.

The relevance of Bradberry’s book, and others like it, to the current global dilemma, only becomes apparent when those who are aware of the actual history of the 20th Century begin observing the growing resistance to the Covid-19 False Flag deception and noting the responses of the protagonists who are now becoming representative of those currently under direct attack by this dark and sinister cabal of psychopaths; in particular, men of the cloth like Pastor Artur Pawlowski and other Christians who, because of their faith and their courage, have remained steadfast in their dedication to God, Truth and Justice and to the spiritual principles which guide their lives. 

It’s my hope that in pointing out who the real enemy is they might see the logic of focussing their accusations of guilt on the true perpetrators of the present crisis and cease from perpetuating a century old myth whose demise is long overdue.

In order to clarify the issue of responsibility it’s my intent in Part 3 to display via graphic and photographic evidence “the rest of the story”. If, as it is said, every picture tells a story (and every painting as well) then readers and viewers will find a potpourri of visual evidence that should expose a completely different face on the man and the nation whom the world has been brainwashed into believing were the Devil incarnate.]  

Part 3

Adolf Hitler the Christian

Not wishing to stray too far afield from the stated objective, as explained in Parts 1 and 2 of this 3-Part series, I must return to Pastor Artur Pawlowski and my initial purpose which is to draw attention not only to the false perception being spread about the net when it comes to the actions of the Calgary, Alberta police but to reach out to all the other writers, critics and victims currently analyzing the events of the day who, and in their earnest attempts to lay blame upon those responsible for this monumental deception the world is now struggling to understand and counter, are also resorting to the same inaccurate, misleading weaponized terminologies which were purposely designed by the criminal cabal to throw the Truth seeker off the scent and onto side trails that only lead them deeper into darkness and deception.

At this point it must be stated clearly and concisely in the most unequivocal manner possible that Christianity was NEVER under threat at any time by the actions of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party. No lie could be further from the Truth. Only in some dreary, deserted corner of hell could some depraved mind conjure up such a grotesque and manifest deception and then perpetuate it throughout the world over the past 88 years since Adolf Hitler was first elected Chancellor of Germany in 1933 in what was the most globally covered, transparent, free election of the time. 

Being a professed Christian and fully confident in his belief in God and the Church, the suggestion that Adolf Hitler or any of his government agencies would have prohibited the masses of German people (themselves also Christians), from gathering to commune in both spirit and flesh, flies in the face of logic and reason. Knowing the true history of Germany during the time of Hitler’s rule rather than merely mumbling and mouthing what most people today think is true because they saw it on the “History Channel” or in some Hollywood movie, the accusation that the German government would be involved in shutting down churches and dragging pastors out of their vehicles along public thoroughfares to then be subjected to the type of physical and mental abuse we’re witness today here in Canada is too ludicrous to even contemplate.

It’s only because the world has been prevented from seeing who Adolf Hitler really was and what his goals and aspirations were for his beleaguered country that the global cartel of psychopaths have been able to sell the world an image of a man that, upon unbiased inspection, proves itself to be as worthless as the German mark became in 1923 after the Treaty of Versailles virtually bankrupt the nation.  

Such are the lies and deceptions of those who, then and now, remain firmly entrenched behind their wall of silence hell-bent on carrying on with their satanic agenda for the destruction of not only Christianity but ultimately, any faith that stands in the way of their atheistic, immoral, heinous agenda for absolute global control.

Given this premise it behooves me to ask of the good Pastor Artur Pawlowski (and anyone else who may be of the same bent of mind), to carefully view the paintings which the real person, Adolf Hitler, bequeathed to the world during his relatively short tenure here on earth and see with their own eyes the things that he held dear to his heart and to then decide whether or not he would be advocating the type of behaviour we’re witnessing today here in “free and democratic” Canada. Let us begin with Adolf’s vision of the birth of Christianity itself.

Ye Shall Know Them By Their Works

Need it be stated that the heart, mind and soul of the artist who created this painting was of a pious, spiritual nature? Is it conceivable to a sane mind that with every brush stroke Adolf Hitler was scheming to destroy Christianity and tear down the churches and imprison Pastors? 

What strikes the eye almost immediately upon viewing many of the paintings that the artist, Adolf Hitler, produced are the churches with their steeples reaching heavenward. 

What most people never learned in school or from the controlled media or Hollywood was that Adolf Hitler’s first aspiration in his early years was to become an architect. When one sees the quality displayed in many of his artistic works it’s obvious he possessed the gift necessary for such a task. After serving in the front lines during WW1 as a corporal and then realizing that his country was being turned into a Bolshevik Communist hell-hole and a cultural Sodom and Gomorrah, his patriotism and love of Germany forced Hitler to set aside his initial dream in order to help the people understand and overcome the dire straits brought upon them by the International Banking cartel that then held his nation locked in its usurious claws. 

 A little steeple here…

Everywhere we see in Adolf’s paintings the love of nature combined with the architecture of the times.

A little steeple there…

 A little steeple almost everywhere.

The Munich Opera House (before the Allied bombers destroyed it during WW2).

More buildings, more steeples with their crosses prominently displayed. 

The architecture of the day drew the artist’s eye to it and he captured it so well.

Unfortunately I am unable to identify all the locations of the buildings that Adolf Hitler painted but given the massive aerial bombing of German cities throughout the war it’s highly likely that most of the structures like those in the above painting were destroyed. 

Landscapes, and again the buildings, were a major part of Adolf’s paintings.

Again we see the German countryside with quaint villages and churches displaying a prominent position within the painting.

Always the love of architectural design is present in so many of Adolf Hitler’s works.

Adolf Hitler’s Love of Animals

It is a well known fact among those who have done their research into the true history that Adolf Hitler, apart from being a vegetarian, was also a great lover of animals. Birds too tended to flock to him as well as deer and squirrels as the following photos show.

Hitler’s Architectural Feats

The two things bequeathed to future citizens by Adolf Hitler that actually survived the onslaught of endless hate propaganda and bombing were the Volkswagen which he personally designed and gifted to the German people and the famed Autobahn which he also designed along with a number of public buildings (I’m not privy at the moment as to whether any of the major public buildings which Hitler designed survived the Allied bombings).

The Two Most Loved Leaders

of the 20th Century

John F. Kennedy – President of the USA

The only comparable leader in the Western world who the people loved and adored in the same manner that the people of Germany loved their leader was John F. Kennedy. The similarity of images below will easily illustrate this. It is little wonder therefore that JFK recognized the genius and true nature of Adolf Hitler and spoke highly of him. (It’s also one of the saddest footnotes to 20th Century history that both these great mens’ lives were ultimately destroyed by the same forces who today are attempting to genocide the bulk of humanity).  

Adolf Hitler – Chancellor of Germany

The image painted by the Western media of Adolf Hitler as being a tyrannical beast out to murder and destroy the family unit and turn the whole world into one gigantic concentration camp filled with slaves is as virulently hateful as all the other lies that were pumped into the heads of the unwary public throughout the 1930’s and ever since. 

Adolf Hitler loved his country and his people and he gave every ounce of his strength to ensure that they would become prosperous again and that the real Beast from the East, i.e. Bolshevik Communism, would never invade and destroy all that the German nation worked so hard to create after 1933. 

No unbiased mind could ever honestly testify that the unabashed enthusiasm and joyful countenance present in the faces of these young German girls waving their flags to their leader was the result of being coerced to do so.

Smiling, Exuberant Youth carrying flowers and raising funds for their projects

Flowers and gifts for their leader were the norm.


So, given my arguments against the misuse of any terms associated with Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party of Germany when describing the brutal treatment Pastor Pawlowski experienced, the obvious question arises: who, if not the dreaded “Nazis”, are responsible for all the notorious behaviour we’re now witnessing on our computer screens as we sit by idly observing the gross acts of the Calgary police toward Pastor Artur Pawlowski and his brother Dawid? 

The answer to that burning question is furnished from historic references provided by various individuals who were present during and after Christianity received its first major blow in 1917 in former Tzarist Russia, a period well before the advent Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich. 

It’s rather ironic really, given the current climate of government shutdowns, hyper pushing of experimental jabs and ‘mandated’ orders to wear masks, that the one reference book which I’m about to quote from; a book that first appeared back in 1943 (of which I possess the 5th Edition that appeared back in 1970) is titled “COMMUNISM UNMASKED”! The 274 page soft cover book authored by Jean Patrice, S.T. M. B.A., is an in-depth study of Communism covering its birth during the 1917 Russian ‘Revolution’ (aka coup) and running through to the time of its 5th edition. 

On page 187 the chapter heading reads: “Persecution of Religion in Russia”. I will quote from that chapter to illustrate in greater detail how the actions of the Communist Party toward Christians and Christianity generally, parallel what we’re beginning to see occur here in Canada and elsewhere around the world, albeit on a more subdued level (at least at this stage of events). The author states:

“Let me say something further with regard to the persecution of religion in Russia.

It is a well-known trick (a contemptible one, I grant) for a footballer to be told to “get” some prominent player in the opposing team. The “getting” of that player will make victory surer for the culprit’s side. Now, the real enemy of Communism is religion. Those who believe in God, who maintain that Christ of the Gospels is God, who believe that man is more than a mere animal, but is destined for an after life, those who believe in the immortality of the soul, who believe in certain inalienable rights of man, who stand up for the sanctity of the home – those maintaining such beliefs have no time for Communism, at least, when they realize the true meaning of Communism. So, then, we must not be surprised that Communism in Russia should have picked out the Churches and clergy for special attack….

Let me give a few details with regard to the slaughter of Churchmen in Russia:

From 1918–1920 [Note we’re looking at exactly one century ago. Ed.] 26 Archbishops and Bishops of the Orthodox Russian Church and 5775 priests were massacred. The eyes of the Archbishop of Perm were put out and his face was then slashed, and his Grace was then buried alive. After enduring two months of penal servitude, the Archbishop of Tobolsk was drowned. The Archbishop of Varoneje was hanged before the altar of a church. In 1923 death sentence was passed on the Catholic Archbishop of Leningrad, Monsignor Cieplak, and on Monsignor Budkieviez. As a result of world-wide protests the Archbishop’s sentence was commuted to solitary refinement, but protests on behalf of Monsignor Budkieviez were fruitless. The Monsignor was stripped, shot in the back of the head, and buried with nine criminals in one of Moscow’s suburbs.

In the summer of 1923, 56 Archbishops and Bishops, most of the Orthodox Church, were held captive in different prisons. Archbishop Cieplak suffered the horrors of solitary confinement in a cell measuring six feet by eight.

In December, 1925, 50 Bishops were arrested. In January the following year the Metropolitan of the Orthodox Church was arrested with 500 of the clergy. From 1917 to the spring of that year the Government had closed 364 churches in Leningrad alone. In the middle of 1927, nine Metropolitan, 25 Archbishops, and 83 Bishops were arrested and thrown into prison or taken into concentration camps, or sent in exile into Siberia or Turkestan or the Caucasus. No charges were made against them; they stood no trial. In the concentration camps the prelates were compelled to do all kinds of menial work.

In the history of the world we have seen one religion persecuting another, but the Communist movement in Russia aims at the destruction of anything supernatural in life.

With the coming of the five-year plans, anti-religious activities became intensified, and those who had any active belief in any form of religion had their physical and moral courage put to the test. W.H. Chamberlin, in “Russia’s Iron Age,” page 312, says: “The basic tenets of religion, its ministers and practitioners are ridiculed in cartoons, caricatures, posters, and moving-picture performances; denounced in books and magazines; satirized on the stage; held up in scorn and opprobrium in the anti-religious museums, which have now been installed in many of the most famous Russian churches and monasteries.”

In 1917 there were about 896 Catholic Priests in Russia, and, according to a Russian paper issued in Warsaw, only 30 remained by 1936. The remainder had either been put to death or imprisoned or banished. It is well know that, to-day, practically no Priests remain at liberty in Russia. Even foreign priests are not allowed to enter the country. 

We may well imagine what has happened to the churches and monasteries and convents in Russia. Some of the churches have been demolished, whilst others have been converted to other uses, namely, anti-religious museums. Monasteries and convents have become the property of the nation, whilst ecclesiastical property is under the control of the local Soviets….”

Article 124 of the new Soviet Constitution says: “In order to insure to citizens freedom of conscience, the Church in the U.S.S.R. is separated from the State and the school from the Church. [Sound familiar? A.T.] Freedom of worship and freedom of anti-religious propaganda are recognized for all the citizens.

Now, let me examine that. The Constitution guarantees “freedom of worship” and “freedom of anti-religious propaganda.” So then, a person can worship God according to the dictates of his conscience, provided he can find a church or a religious minister. But it is extremely difficult to find one. The Communist Party declared that at the end of the second five-year plan, namely, 1937, there would not be a single edifice in Russia consecrated to religion. The atheistic paper of Russia, entitled “Bezbojink,” of May, 1935, when speaking of the churches, says: “We have closed all the opium shops.” In January, 1936, Soviet newspapers declared that the last Catholic Priest in Odessa was cast into prison.

In the schools, by means of the cinema and newspapers and books, anti-God propaganda is being pushed on. It is difficult to realize fully the appalling results of the Communistic attitude towards religion and morality and family life. Sex vice has become rampant. In November, 1920, the U.S.S.R. became the first nation in the world’s history to legalize abortion.” 


It shouldn’t take a rocket scientist to be able to put 2 and 2 together and get 4 rather than attempting the old Soviet method that Joseph Stalin used during the early 1930’s when his government’s economic recovery program motto was 2 + 2 = 5 and he was already solving the problem of overpopulation by starving to death around 10 million Ukrainians and sending millions more Russian Christians to the Gulag Archipelago where the vast majority were worked to death in the slave labour camps. He was well ahead of Gates, Fauci & Co. and the WHO and not forgetting to “Think Global and Act Local” let’s not leave out our own provincial government Kommissars like Alberta’s Jason Kenney and B.C.’s John Horgan & Associates. 

Premier Kenney isn’t really that difficult to figure out. I’ve followed his crooked course for years beginning with his tenure in the former Harper Conservative Party as Canada’s Defence Minister. Rather than doing his due diligence and actually defending Canada’s sovereignty he was always too busy kissing foreign ass and taking free trips to the Middle East compliments of lobbyist handouts. 

The fact that he would condone the actions of the Calgary Police department and the Edmonton cops who so enjoy locking up churches and intimidating Christian worshippers doesn’t surprise me in the least. I think that little beanie that he has atop his dome is restricting his 7th Chakra too much so that he’s lost his connection with the heavenly realms.

Then again, maybe he’s never been a real hockey fan and is unaware of some of the more provocative teams that Alberta has hosted over the years. I’m positive that if  his ol’ grandpa or granny was once a fan of the famous Edmonton Swastikas who were the hottest team on the ice back in 1916 that his attitude toward those nasty “Nazis” in the Calgary Police force would be a lot different!

Calgary Mayor – Naheed Nenshi

Then there’s this goofy SOB who thinks that it’s “white nationalists” (a code term of course for neo-Nazis) who are raising all the fuss about the killer jabs and the masks where everyone’s breathing in their own exhaust fumes thanks to Alberta and BC’s “ mask mandates”. 

And why, now that we’re on the subject of the Calgary Police, are we not hearing anything about the head honcho who’s in charge of this gang of hooligans, Chief Mark Neufeld?

The BC Three

As for BC and our own 3 Bullies on the block we too are looking at a group of manic misfit managers who are so out to lunch in terms of honesty, integrity and reality itself that like Albertans we’ve got some very serious work to do in order to stop these psychopaths from killing off more and more unwary citizens who, because of their sincere belief and trust in their government, are being bushwhacked and hoodwinked and jabbed with poisons that will destroy their lives and in the process likely destroy countless others around them including their families.  

But, putting all levity aside, Christians who have studied their Bible and understand the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ should be the first group of people to realize exactly who is behind all this Satanic cult energy we see manifesting practically everywhere around the world. Christianity has always been under attack and always will be so long as Satan is left to do his thing and lately he’s been having a heyday doing what comes naturally for the Prince of Darkness. 

One ray of hope that I do see is the willingness on the part of many Christians today to openly embrace and cooperate with others who also see what they see and whether this common darkness is perceived as being Satan or Lucifer or simply power-crazed lunatics and psychopaths and criminals, Christians are uniting with this growing mass of individuals everywhere who realize that they’ve got a real common enemy that MUST BE STOPPED and it’s now imperative that we all put sectarian issues aside and work together if this Beast 666 is going to be destroyed so that life might carry on as God meant it to be.


P.S. If any reader can pass this series of articles on to Pastor Pawlowski it would be greatly appreciated.

The Politics of Language: Propaganda, Truth & Justice – A Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel Special 3-Part Series (Part 2)

The Politics of Language: Propaganda, Truth & Justice  

A Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel Special 3-Part Series (Part 2)


Arthur Topham


The Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel

May 18th, 2021 

[Editor’s Note: Some years back, prior to my former website being removed from the internet in March of 2017, I had published a series of images taken from a book published by Ian Verner Macdonald a former Canadian Trade Commissioner who had served successfully in Europe, Africa, Asia, the Middle East and North America following his war service in the RCAF. Mr. Macdonald’s interest in world history inspired him to investigate and research the causes behind WW2 and in the process he put together a rather large collection of images that were used in Canada’s msm during WW2 for propaganda purposes. His book, published in 2009 was titled, “Star Weekly at War”. I became acquainted with Mr. Macdonald and communicated with him via email for a number of years. The following visual images that will be presented to the reader in Part 2 of this 3-Part series are all taken from the Toronto Star Weekly and will illustrate how, during the war, the anti-German propaganda was presented to the Canadian public. 

Following the visual presentation I’ve published excerpts from Mr. Macdonald’s Epilogue which will summarize and complete the 2nd part of this Series.

In Part 3 I shall present the other side of the picture that our Canadian forefathers and foremothers were never privileged to have witnessed and which might have given them cause to pause before venturing into a second world war.]

Part 2


Masks, mask, masks! No getting around them it seems.
Ah yes, let’s help them poor peasants in the Soviet Union. You know the one’s that Stalin didn’t cart off to the Gulag Archipelago by the millions from Ukraine and elsewhere to be worked to death in the concentration camps.
Looks so romantic eh as these Bolshevik Communists go riding into a wave of machine gun fire. Takes one back to WW1.
“We fight for freedom” Freedom for whom one might ask? Is Britain free today? Is Canada free today? Is China free today?
I include the following Front Page Covers where the “Japs” are on the receiving end of the propaganda. Strange isn’t it how we never see any references to the “Japs” in the National Post or any of the other corporate-controlled media in Canada these days.
A “Jap Trap”. What a nifty idea eh? Only in Canada you say? It should be noted that this particular image isn’t a part of the Star Weekly collection.
Let’s not forget good old British Columbia and the Vancouver Harbour with the plane cruising over famous Lion’s Gate Bridge.


~ from “Star Weekly at War”


Ian Verner Macdonald

“…As an active combatant, Canada was seen by all men of goodwill as making a significant contribution to the defence of Western Christian civilization. Conforming with the English-language media world wide, the Star accepted without question the thesis that Hitler and the Nazis had to be stopped lest ‘we all end up in concentration camps’ or worse, under the heel of a ferocious dictator and his sinister Gestapo. Such was the temper of the times.

There was no hint in the Star Weekly that there could be a much more menacing evil afoot, even though some coverage was given to the Soviet invasion of Finland and the Nazi-Soviet pact that expanded Stalin’s bloodthirsty rule into Poland and the Baltic countries where thousands died at the hands of anti-Christian Kommissars, many tortured to death and their families sent to Siberia in sealed box cars. Even less attention was paid to the devilish mischief wrought by the vengeful, punitive Treaty of Versailles. It was the festering resentment of the misery caused by the unfair terms of this treaty that set the stage for the emergence in the ’twenties of an inspiring populist Fuehrer, promising to restore German honour and dignity, and the German economy, by the retrieval of its conquered territories. 

Once Canada was committed by Prime Minister Mackenzie King to enter the war against Germany on Britain’s side on September 9, 1939 (no doubt with mixed feelings since he had written an adulatory letter to Hitler shortly before suggesting that history would remember him as the “Statesman of the 20th Century” for  his accomplishments), the Star put the best face on the inevitable death and destruction, shielding readers from the disconcerting reality. Like most other media, the Star Weekly glamourized the war, helping to persuade hundreds of thousands of young men, including this writer, to lust for the opportunity to get into action, preferably in the RCAF even when, for a time, the chance of survival in Bomber Command was slim, at best. 

…The Star Weekly has passed from the scene, as have most participants in the war it so vividly and optimistically portrayed, leaving survivors to wonder how a Good War and Total Victory could have brought such calamity and so tragically betrayed the trusting patriots who had dedicated, and often lost, their lives in rallying to the defence of Freedom.

It is now clear that the celebrated Allied Victory did not save Western Christian Civilization as promised, but precipitated its demise. There is even good reason to doubt that the case for making war was ever sufficiently plausible and compelling to justify the inevitable horrendous sacrifice, especially coming on the heels of the Great War (“to end all war”) that already had stripped both the Allied nations and Germany of many of their best and brightest, and, in most cases, of the victim’s priceless progeny.

…In retrospect, the Star Weekly, with the best of intentions and in tune with the times, appears to have accepted the Hollywood version of German intentions, and along with the entire country, acceded to the most monstrous contrived miscalculation in history, carried out against the best interests of the British Commonwealth and Western democracies. Britons and Canadians were led to believe that their German kinfolk, who held no animosity toward them, were the enemy who threatened their freedom when in fact the enemy was the atheistic Soviet regime whose bloodthirsty Kommissars had liquidated, by 1939, at least 20 million Christians and was intent on subjugating Europe at the earliest opportunity. Germany offered the sole effective defence against such a fearful prospect.

Germany, astutely and persistently but with increased frustration, sought peace with Britain in order to concentrate on eliminating the imminent Soviet threat but, on Churchill’s orders, the generous “peace with honour” proposals were rejected out of hand, sounding the death knell for tens of millions, including 45 thousand young Canadians. The same Churchill, when shortly after the destruction of Germany the Soviet threat quickly re-emerged, quipped flippantly to an Aide “It looks like we slaughtered the wrong pig!” Britain and Canada were soon in a military alliance with Germany, but it was a decade too late. The hostile Soviet Union had already enslaved Eastern and Central Europe and the Baltic countries. Poland, the country whose independence Britain had ostensibly gone to war for to defend from Hitler, was cynically delivered into the bloodstained clutches of a far more sinister and malevolent dictator.

Other newsworthy issues and anomalies even more studiously ignored by the Star Weekly were the identities of the sinister forces behind the inexplicable decision to declare war on on Germany alone when both Germany and the Soviet Union invaded Poland in September, 1939 (no less illogical than the subsequent refusal of the Churchill government to accept an honourable peace). The rationale for making war was not widely debated at the time, partly because of censorship and self-censorship by the media….

In the dangerous realignments of the immediate post-war era, the miscalculations of Allied “statesmen” became clear; the most calamitous being the designation of our Christian European ethnic and cultural German kin-folk as the “enemy.” In fact, Germany was our natural ally, just as the atheistic, genocidal anti-Christian Stalin dictatorship was our natural enemy. Making war on Germany ensured that Communism (and [edited for legal reasons. Ed.]) would triumph, and that Britain and European importance in world affairs would decline accordingly.

…Could there have been a more palatable outcome than the Pyrrhic victory? “What if Hitler had won?” – a rhetorical question asked usually to evoke shivers of horror among listeners. But if Germany had won, arguably the world would by now be in a much better and safer place. And the “what if” is not nearly as far-fetched as Allied propagandists would have us believe. Germany certainly would have won if Britain and France, and eventually America, had acted in their own obvious best interests and remained neutral or entered the war on Germany’s side….

Had Britain not been deceived and betrayed into war with Germany, with whom she had no authentic quarrel, there would have been no Second World War, tens of millions of lives would have been spared, priceless European architecture would not have been destroyed, Europe would have been united under German leadership, international communism would have become a footnote in history, trillions of dollars could have been used for the betterment of mankind, the environment could have been protected, the Cold War would have been forstalled, (along with the Korean and Vietnmese wars and communist sponsored revolutions elsewhere), negotiations for the resettlement of Six Million or more [edited for legal reasons. Ed.] to Uganda or Madagascar would have reached fruition, there would have been peace and justice in the Middle East, China would have evolved along Taiwanese lines under capitalism, sharing with Japan and the Colonial Powers influence over S.E. Asia, there would have been no UN meddling, no Third World turmoil, no “refugee” migrations, no deprivation of freedom in the name of “human rights,” no Affirmative Action, no asinine Political Correctness and, above all, no subversion and corruption of Western society and the democratic political process by a cunning, avaricious alien minority. 

It does not speak well of Establishment historians and journalists that they refuse to address squarely what is probably the most crucial and perplexing enigma of our time, namely, the real purpose of WWII and why politicians, notably Churchill and Roosevelt, knowingly acted against their countries’ best interests. Honest, unbiased, patriotic scholars who have attempted to stimulate discussion of this intriguing issue have been viciously denounced as historical revisionists (or worse), and their findings have been viciously suppressed. [Editor’s note: this, I would add, has been my own fate with respect to the past 14 years of enforced litigation, arrests, jail, trials, home invasions, msm vilification, etc. and is still ongoing as I type these words.]

The Toronto Star Weekly did its wartime duty in boosting morale and enthusiasm for the seemingly worthy cause – the preservation of freedom and justice and protection from purportedly-looming world-wide dictatorship. Ironically, the fundamental freedoms, especially freedom of expression, have been steadily eroded throughout the world – not least in Canada – largely because of the war, and the dictatorship of the New World Order could well be at hand….”

~ Ian Verner Macdonald


(End of Part 2)

The Politics of Language: Propaganda, Truth & Justice – A Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel Special 3-Part Series (Part 1)

[Editor’s Note: At no time in my tenure here on Planet Earth as a publisher, editor and journalist has the issue of Propaganda become more important than today. With the sudden onslaught in 2020 of the specious Covid -19 attack upon Humanity the wheels of this gigantic, psycho-technic juggernaut have increased to such an intensity that the average human being is now faced with such a staggering quantity of psychic/mental and visual data that their capacity to discern what is truth and what is falsehood (i.e. propaganda) is at a critical stage of being overwhelmed.

The expression “Information overload” has been with us since the 1960s but its application in the past tended to apply to specific instances but never has this relatively recent phenomenon assumed such a paramount, wide-spread degree of influence upon the general public as what we’re now witnessing with the plethora of information surrounding the Covid debate.

The year 1962 (here in Canada no less!) brought to the world Marshall McLuhan’s paradigm-breaking book “The Gutenberg Galaxy” followed by his next best-seller “Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man” in 1964 to be then topped off in 1967 with his and Quentin Fiore’s visual presentation “The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects.” All these books, plus other productions that sprang forth in response to them, changed the world in ways that most people still have yet to fathom. For the younger generations that followed any analysis of these thought-provoking texts has likely never occurred yet the effects of the new media which formed the basis of the texts can now be seen in the outward growth and expression of resistance and protest currently manifesting around the globe.

Part 1 of this series will analyze how the old media paradigm, aka the establishment media or the mainstream media (msm) or the corporate media, is presenting the Covid narrative to the world in what can only described as a fierce, fervent, unrelenting attempt to persuade the general public to acquiesce to the demands of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in as quick a manner as humanly possible.

Using mind-control techniques that were invented back in the first half of the 20th century – a period of our world history pock marked by two major world wars – the msm, in its pursuit of actualizing the One World Government agenda, continues to employ all of its ancient arsenal of weaponized language that proved effective in days gone by. The majority of the accompanying graphic images used to illustrate my thesis in Parts 2 & 3 will be, for some, both shocking and provocative. I make no apology for their use. 

The Western world, throughout the 20th century and into the 21st (graphically reinforced by 911), has been continuously ruled by deception and false flag events, all of which, thanks to not being addressed and rectified earlier, have finally devolved into the global crisis that mankind is now facing. To understand it all (rather than to be overwhelmed to the point of being numbed and disabled by it and ultimately deceived into resigning oneself into a state of suspended apathy) is to see both sides of the narrative and to then judge via reason, logic, common sense and one’s intuitive heart-felt sense, what is Truth and what isn’t.

Part 1 will therefore focus on the mechanics of how immediate generations after WW2 were subjected to the same continuous assault upon their minds as what the adult populations were subjected to throughout the 1930s and 1940s when it came to the causes of the war and ultimately who was responsible for  precipitating it.

Part 2 will focus on the role that the Canadian media performed during WW2. To illustrate the wartime propaganda I will be utilizing a number of graphic images taken from the Toronto Star Weekly’s Front Pages plus a commentary by the editor of the book STAR WEEKLY AT WAR Mr. Ian Verner Macdonald. 

Part 3 will be, as Paul Harvey, former American radio broadcaster for ABC News Radio used to comment “the rest of the story”; the part the world in general has still not been fully appraised of even though many writers have produced the evidence to show what the Western media purposely has left out in order to meet their own sinister agenda.] 

The Politics of Language:

Propaganda, Truth & Justice  

A Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel Special 3-Part Series


Arthur Topham


The Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel

May 18th, 2021 

“For nothing is secret that shall not be made manifest; 
Neither anything hid, that shall not be known and come abroad”.
– Luke 8:17.

Part 1

One could hear the screams of Street Pastor Artur Pawlowski as the Calgary police manhandled him to the his knees on the pavement, forcing his arms to fold behind his back as they clamped their handcuffs around his wrists: “Nazis!”, “Gestapo!” he cried out as the traffic sped by along the freeway.

It was all too reminiscent of past days; days that stretch back through recorded history to the time when Jesus Christ and his Apostles were given similar and worse treatment by the powers of the Priesthood and Pagan Rome. 

And for what did these injustices take place? Were these individuals thieves and murderers? Were they corrupt politicians who had sold out their country to alien forces? Were they traitors who, under cover of night, for silver or gold, raised the heavy oak timbers that held fast the security gates of their countrymen’s sanctuary allowing access to their enemies? No. They were simply God’s children working for their Heavenly Father in the Spirit of Love and Peace, labouring to awaken the slumbering masses and bringing tidings of great joy to their hungry hearts, minds and souls. 

In the case of Pastor Artur Pawlowski we see once again Christianity itself epitomized in one individual, symbolizing the ever-recurring dilemma that faces those willing to speak Truth to power. But there is a missing factor in the majority of Christians today; one that was ever present when the Lord walked upon the desert sands in days of yore. That is the substance of this essay.

As the article title states, we are concerned about not only Truth and Justice but also the “politics of language” which, of necessity, requires immediate address and concerns not only the courageous, righteous Pastor Artur Pawlowski but anyone, be they Christian or otherwise, who is honestly concerned about the principles of Truth and Justice in a world now fraught with an inestimable preponderance of outright lies and massive deception; all of which emanate from the hidden force now controlling the major news sources around the world.

It must, of course, also be categorically emphasized from the start that this force manipulating the established media is one that didn’t just suddenly appear back in January of 2020 along with the advent of Covid-19. The facts, given proper exposure, will show that it has been with us now in its present form for at least the last 100 years and throughout that period has played a paramount role in manipulating and affecting every significant event that has occurred on the earthly stage. As preposterous as that might sound at first mention I must leave it as such and continue on with my stated thesis. 

Recorded history, as we’ve come to know it throughout the 20th Century and now in the nascent beginnings of the 21 Century, is for the most part a fabricated, manufactured, illusionary reality. Yet, even though I assert such a viewpoint my arguments in favour of such a position don’t deny actual events that manifested in real life only the manner in which they have been interpreted for the masses and projected to them through highly contentious lenses; ones which the average person had absolutely no control over.

When I use the term ‘politics of language’ I’m speaking of how the controlled media furnishes its audience with weaponized language – be it single words, idiomatic expressions or phrases – which it then repeats again and again across all of its platforms, be they the print media (newspapers, magazines, books), the televised new media, tv generally, the Hollywood movie industry and the Internet. Whenever a single word or phrase is coined by those behind the media curtain it becomes promoted subliminally and overtly to the general public with such repetitive impact and power of persuasion that within a generation or two the masses of listeners and readers will by then have assimilated it into their minds and will begin regurgitating whatever mental morsels they’ve figuratively swallowed without ever realizing that it might have originally been a calculated, fabricated lie dispensed for purely propaganda purposes. 

That, in essence, is what this writer sees occurring today when we witness good (or bad) people, be they Christian or otherwise, shouting out words loaded to the hilt with false meaning and connotation; words which, when heard by others, tend to automatically become associated with particular individuals or ethnic groups or nation states regardless of whether or not the meaning is correct.  

This phenomenon of manipulating words, that began in earnest around the 20th century, might best be categorized (on an intellectual level at least) under a heading such as “Psycho-Linguistics” but on a deeper, more occult level, it borders on or actually finds its origins within that psychic sphere generally labeled the “black arts” under the sub-title “Sorcery.” 

The godfather of these highly infused words or phrases is, undoubtedly the term “anti-semite” which came to prominence around the first two generations of the 20th century when the actions or deeds of a particular group (for various reasons), began to appear in newspapers and periodicals in Great Britain, the European Continent and North America. The group in question, being exceedingly small but at the same time also powerful beyond most people’s comprehension due to their financial position, began to counter the bad press they were starting to receive by colluding and using their “power of the purse” to start purchasing the very publishing houses and newspapers that were, in their estimation, committing the very foul deed which the group alleged was being perpetrated upon themselves. It was likely the first overt act on the part of any group or organization to change the thinking patterns of the general public. Some might even go so far as to suggest that it was the actual beginning of what we now tend to call the “Big Brother” news media as it was coined back in the late 1940s by British journalist and author George Orwell.

I’ll give readers one poignant example of the influential effect that this method of empowering words and expressions has had on the publishing industry, journalism in general, and global politics. 

The following quote [edited for legal reasons. Ed.] comes from one of the 20th century’s great journalists and researchers the late Douglas Reed in a book that was completed in 1956 but didn’t see the light of day until after his death in 1978:

“A private organization which can produce such results [i.e, weaponize a term. Ed.] is obviously powerful; there is nothing comparable in the world. Mr. Vincent Sheehan wrote in 1949, “There is scarcely a voice in the United States that dares raise itself for the rights, any rights, of the Arabs; any slight criticism of the [censored. Ed.] high command is immediately labelled as anti-semitic”. . . [Again, recent events in the Middle East prove the validity & the poignancy of Sheehan’s words.A.T.]

“How is the oracle worked? By what means has America (and the entire West) been brought to the state that no public man aspires to office, or editor feels secure at his desk, until he has brought out his prayer-mat and prostrated himself to [censored. Ed.]? How have presidents and prime ministers been led to compete for the approval of this faction like bridesmaids for the bride’s bouquet? Why do leading men suffer themselves to be paraded at hundred-dollar-a-plate banquets for [censored. Ed.], or to be herded on to[censored. Ed.] platforms to receive “plaques” for services rendered?

“The power of money and the prospect of votes have demonstrably been potent lures, but in my judgment by far the strongest weapon is this power to control published information; to lay stress on what a faction wants and to exclude from it all that the faction dislikes, and so to be able to give any selected person a “good” or a “bad” press. [emphasis added. Ed.] This is in fact control of “the mob”. In today’s language it is “the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses”, as [censored. Ed.] said, but it is an ancient, Asiatic art and was described, on a famous occasion, by Saint Matthew and Saint Mark: “The chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude . . . The chief priests moved the people . . .”

Let that suffice for the moment in terms of spotlighting the issue at hand. I’ll now cut to the chase and identify the currently abused terms and explain why they were concocted in the first place and what the real intent of their misuse was meant to create in the minds of those still being indoctrinated with these false terminologies. 

The second weaponized word or term that’s been manipulated by the Big Brother controlled media since its early prominence in the 1930’s, is the offensive pejorative epithet “Nazi”; a word that was intentionally attached not only to the National Socialist German Worker’s Party of Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich but, by extension and through extrapolation, to the German people generally as an ethnic group. 

This is one of the primary politicized terms which Pastor Artur Pawlowski tends to employ whenever he wishes to describe those who are trying to shut down his church services and control his life’s work. The misuse or misapplication of this derogatory sobriquet to describe the Calgary police is therefore only apparent to those who know the real history of the 20th century and who have, through self-effort, been able to debrief themselves of the conditioning they were subjected to throughout their lifetime. Of course it must also be understood that Pastor Pawlowski is not the only person who has fallen prey to the sorcerer’s spell. Most people have, myself included.

My own life experience is a good example of what I’m talking about. I, like the bulk of Canadians born and raised in Canada, was ingrained with the negative connotations connected with the term “Nazi” from the time I first began reading comic books around the mid-1950s. War comics were the rage during WW2  and running through the 1940’s and 50’s and into the 60’s mainly. They were also one of the predominant methods by which the hidden force behind the publishing industry was able to permeate and impress up the young minds of future generations the subliminal message that Adolf Hitler was the most evil person on the planet and that the “Nazis” were the acme of blood-thirsty, violent, sadistic savagery, to be hated and avoided at all costs. While this might at first sound like I’m stretching it a bit one only need note that even today many of Canada’s mainstream newspapers ( the National Post being the best example), rarely issue an edition that doesn’t somewhere include the term “Nazi” or “neo-Nazi” or some other similar disparaging term such as “holocaust denier” or “hate monger” or “white supremacist” or “racist”: terms that that the mind automatically associates with Germany in one way or another. 

This mindset continued well into my adult life, extending into the period when I began publishing my own newspaper back in June of 1998 at the age of 51. Two years later, it was still firmly entrenched in my subconscious mind and occasionally found expression within the pages of my monthly tabloid The Radical as illustrated below in the Front Page of the September, 1999 edition where I headlined an article “NATO NAZIS”. 

Fortunately, for me, at one point an elderly German-Canadian reader who later became a subscriber to the paper, a person who had lived through the period of the 1930s and 1940s in National Socialist Germany was able to persuade me, through reason, common sense and example, that my views were not in keeping with the reality of the time period and was thus able to set me straight upon a path that eventually corrected all the erroneous lies that I had assimilated throughout my lifetime. The truth set me free and opened my eyes so that I was able to then see the propaganda being presented to the public by the msm for what it really was.

(End of Part 1)

Freedom Under Siege

[Editor’s Note: The following article on Canada’s Charter of Rights & Freedoms by Gerry T. Neal is essential reading for anyone interested in Canadian political affairs, especially in relation to the current global dilemma now facing not only Canadians but the world at large. Mr. Neal has captured the essence and the history of this controversial document and how it will likely play out in the days and months and years ahead. He clearly shows how it is connected to Canada’s Constitution and moreover his brilliant analysis of its fundamental flaws will give readers a heads up as to why their most cherished of human rights and freedoms document may not be the panacea that Canadians believe it to be when it comes to challenging both Federal and Provincial levels of government over their Orwellian dictates that are now threatening the very superstructure of our once basic freedoms.

This article is also very dear to me as well on a personal level. Having been in a running battle with Canada’s powerful foreign lobbyist censors now for the past 14 years and having incurred and endured their wrath plus the never-ending corporate media slander and maligning that automatically spews forth whenever someone is accused of the alleged crimes that Mr. Neal’s article analyses in great depth in his article, I am greatly indebted to the author for having clarified the overall picture with his cogent and colourful critique. 

Just in my own case alone the lack of any firm legal precedents in the Charter that would have stymied the efforts on the part of the complainants who attacked my name, my person and my profession has cost the Canadian taxpayer close to 2 million dollars of their hard-won earnings and my case is still not settled to this very date.

As Mr. Neal clearly points out, our current Prime Minister “Captain Airhead”, is very fond of creating more and more laws that will protect his benefactors and himself from exposure and his latest ‘PET’ peeve Bill C-10 is one that every thinking Canadian should be very, very concerned about.

One final thing. Mr. Neal’s articles don’t usually include memes such as you’ll see here. The one’s that do accompany his article are my own and for the most part were created over the past 14 years of my struggle to retain our basic human rights.]   

Freedom Under Siege


Gerry T. Neal

I have never thought very highly of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms which was added to our constitution in 1982. Note the wording there. The Charter is not itself our constitution but merely a part of it and a late addition at that.  Those who make the mistake of calling the Charter itself our constitution have bought in to the American superstition that a constitution is a piece of paper that keeps a government from going bad through its magical powers.  A constitution is a country’s system of law and government, the institutions that comprise it, and the traditions that inform their motions. The largest part of it is unwritten and this is true even in the American republic. Documents like our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the one the Americans call their Constitution are merely parts of the Canadian and American constitutions respectively. They are the laws that define and set limits to the power of government institutions. They have no power to keep government within those limits apart from the loyalty of those who hold public office in obeying them, the willingness of the courts to uphold them, and the faithful vigilance of the public. 

My low estimation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is not because I don’t like the rights and freedoms that are listed in that document. With a few exceptions, such as the “equality rights” written in Animal Farm style doublespeak in Section 15, these are rights and freedoms that I consider to be among the most valuable elements of our Common Law tradition.   It is rather because the Charter has made these rights and freedoms less secure rather than more. In part this is due to flaws in the Charter itself such as the “notwithstanding clause” in Section 33 and the broad loophole in Section 1 which effectually nullify the Charter as far as the whole point of constitutionally protected rights and freedoms, that is to say that they are supposed to limit what the government can do so as to protect us from the abusive exercise of its powers, goes. The Charter’s loopholes and exceptions protect the government instead of us and for this reason former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney was right to say that it is not worth the paper it is written on. It is also, however, because the Charter has encouraged a way of thinking about our rights and freedoms in a way that is the fundamental opposite of that which has historically belonged to our Common Law and traditional institutions of constitutional monarchy and parliament. It encourages us to think of our rights and freedoms as privileges bestowed upon us by government to be limited or taken away by government freely as it sees fit, rather than our own property. 

The consequences of this way of thinking having become pervasive have been most evident over the course of the last year. Section 2 of the Charter identifies four freedoms as being fundamental. The first of these is freedom of conscience and religion. The third is the freedom of peaceful assembly. The fourth is the freedom of association. The whole point, remember, of having the Charter designate these freedoms as essential is to place limits on government power, to tell the government that it must keep its hands off of these things. Yet ever since the World Health Organization declared the spread of the Wuhan bat flu to be a pandemic last March, our provincial governments have treated these freedoms as if they were completely non-existent, much less fundamental and protected by constitutional law and the Dominion government has constantly been urging the provincial governments to clamp down on us in violation of these freedoms in even more severe ways. 

In 1986 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in the case of R v Oakes.  David Oakes had been arrested with drugs in his possession and under what was then Section 8 of the Narcotics Control Act was presumed to be guilty of trafficking. He challenged the constitutionality of Section 8 on the grounds that it violated the presumption of innocence, a civil right spelled out in Section 11 (d) of the Charter and which had been long established as part of the Common Law tradition. That the provision of the NCA being challenged did indeed violate the civil right in question was easily demonstrated, but the Court then had to decide whether the violation was justifiable under the “reasonable limits” loophole in Section 1 of the Charter. The Court’s ruling established what has ever since been the litmus test for this question. The Court ruled that for a law which violates a Charter right or freedom to be justifiable under the “reasonable limits” clause, it first had to have a “pressing and substantial” goal. Second, it had to meet the three qualifications of a) being “rationally connected” to the goal of the law, b) only impairing the rights and freedoms in question minimally, and c) not overwhelming the benefit hoped to be achieved with its negative effects. 

It is quite obvious that the public health measures fail to meet the second of the three qualifications of the second part of the Supreme Court’s Oakes’ test. When the public health officer tells you that you cannot have any visitors to your home, even if you meet outside, as is currently the case in Manitoba, he is clearly not trying to only “minimally impair” your freedom of association. What he is doing is disregarding freedom of association entirely. The provincial legislature is not allowed to do this constitutionally, nor can it delegate to the public health officer the authority to do so. The legislature cannot delegate what it does not legitimately possess itself. When the public health officer orders churches, synagogues, and mosques not to meet for the largest part of a year, cancels the most important festivals of these religions, and only permits re-opening at a severely reduced capacity that requires churches to betray the tenets of their own faith and turn worshippers away, he is similarly disregarding freedom of conscience and religion rather than making sure that his orders only “minimally impair” this freedom. There is also plenty of evidence that the public health orders fail to meet the third qualification of the Oakes’ test as well. The costs of lockdowns, measured in the destruction of lives due to the breakdown of mental health and the rise in substance abuse and suicides, the erosion of community and social capital, and the devastation of businesses and livelihoods, has been tremendous and far exceeds any questionable benefits of these insane, unjust, evil and oppressive restrictions. Indeed, I believe the case could be made that the public health measures fail every single element of the Oakes’ test. 

The provincial governments have gotten away with all this stercus tauri because they have until fairly recently met with only minimal resistance on the part of the Canadian public. This can be attributed to a number of causes. One of these, of course, is the hysterical and irrational fear generated by the mainstream corporate media that have been deceitfully and despicably portraying a virus that produces no to mild symptoms in most people who contract it, from which the vast majority of people who actually do get sick recover, and which in many if not most jurisdictions has an average age of fatality that is higher than the average expected lifespan of the general public, as if it were the second coming of the bubonic plague. Another cause is the new attitude which has been encouraged among Canadians, especially by the Liberals, since 1982, of regarding our rights and freedoms as privileges bestowed upon us by the government in the Charter rather than what they are, our lawful property as free subjects of the Crown which it is the government’s duty to respect.   

The assault on our freedoms of religion, peaceful assembly, and association have come from the provincial governments. At the same time the second of the four freedoms designated as fundamental in the Charter has come under attack from the Liberals who are in power in the Dominion government. This is the freedom of “thought, belief, opinion and expression”. Whereas our freedoms of religion, peaceful assembly, and association have never been this besieged before in Canadian history, our freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression has taken hits every time the Liberal Party led by a Trudeau has come to power in Ottawa. It has been less than ten years since we finally got rid of one of the vilest elements of Pierre Trudeau’s legacy, the notorious Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.   While the entire Canadian Human Rights Act of 1977 is, in fact, an affront to freedom of thought because, despite its title, it has nothing to do with protecting our rights either as Canadians or human beings from government abuses, but is instead all about prohibiting the crimethink of discrimination on the part of individual Canadians, Section 13 was the Act’s worst provision by far. By defining any electronic communication of information “likely to” expose someone protected against discrimination “to hatred or contempt” as an act of discrimination it in effect forbade all negative criticism of groups protected against discrimination or individuals belonging to such groups, regardless of the truthfulness or justice of the criticism in question.   

Section 13 was finally abolished during the premiership of Stephen Harper thanks to a private member’s bill repealing the foul section that received enough support from Conservative MPs and Liberal MPs of the pre-Trudeau variety – these had not yet been purged from the party – to pass Parliament. Neither Stephen Harper nor his Minister of Multiculturalism, Jason Kenney, who is currently overseeing the throwing of pastors in gaol and the barricading of churches in Alberta, had much to do with this for although they had spoken out against Human Rights Tribunals and their unjust infringement upon freedom of thought and speech on their road to power, in office they betrayed most of what they had once stood for, apparently having sold their souls to get there. The demise of Section 13 has long been lamented by Pierre Trudeau’s son, Captain Airhead, and when he became Prime Minister in 2015 he dropped a number of hints that he would be seeking to revive it. The appeal of Section 13 to Captain Airhead was based on more than just the fact that it had been originally introduced when his father was in power. More than any previous Liberal leader, Captain Airhead has been of the mindset that once a progressive goal has been attained, all debate about it ought to cease. This was evident even before he became Prime Minister when he purged the party of its pro-life members. More than any previous Liberal leader, he has enthusiastically endorsed fringe progressive causes that could not possibly achieve widespread popular support on their own merits without measures that intimidate and suppress dissenters. More than any previous Liberal leader he has been prone to tell Canadians who disagree with him that they are not welcome in their own country. He has used the expression “there is no place for X in Canada” far more liberally than any previous leader and with a much wider range of Xs. (1) In all of this he has demonstrated the sort of sick, censorious, mindset to which something like Section 13 appeals. In December of 2019, after he won re-election in the sense that he managed to squeak out a plurality despite falling majorly in the polls from where he had been four years previously, he instructed his Cabinet that fighting online “hate speech” would be one of their priorities in the new session of Parliament. Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault was specifically charged with finding a way to force social media platforms to remove what the Liberals consider to be “hate speech” within twenty-four hours of being told by the government to do so. This would be Section 13 magnified to the nth degree. 

In response to this directive, Guilbeault came up with a bill that pursued the same goal as Section 13 through a different avenue. Last November he introduced Bill C-10, or “An Act to Amend the Broadcasting Act” into Parliament. This bill if passed would place internet media under the same regulatory authority of the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) as older electronic media such as radio and television broadcasters. By going this route, Guilbeault could maintain that his goal was not to censor what individual Canadians post on the internet, but to ensure that the companies that make shows and movies available through online streaming follow the same Canadian content guidelines as other broadcasters, a goal consistent with his portfolio as Heritage Minister. That having been said, the Bill as originally drafted would have given the CRTC regulatory authority over individual Canadians’ user-generated content on social media. When objections to this were raised the Bill was amended to include an exception for individual user-generated content, but this exception was removed in committee late last month around the same time that the government moved to shut down debate on a motion that the Conservatives had introduced calling for a review of whether or not the bill violated the Charter. None of this inspires much confidence in the Heritage Minister’s claim that the aim of this bill is cultural protectionism and not censorship of thought. On Monday, faced with backlash over all of this, Guilbeault promised that they would make it “crystal clear” that the user-generated content will not be subjected to the same sort of regulatory control as television programming. Needless to say, he ought not to be taken at his word on this.  Indeed, Michael Geist, the law professor at the University of Ottawa who has been one of the foremost critics of Bill C-10, has already said that the amendment the Heritage Committee proposed on Thursday evening fails to follow through on Guilbeault’s promises

It is worth observing here that with Bill C-10, Captain Airhead and Steven Guilbeault have returned to the very first thing the original Trudeau Liberals did to control the minds of Canadians and limit their freedom of thought. At the very beginning of the first Trudeau premiership the Right Honourable John G. Diefenbaker pointed out how the Liberals were threatening freedom of thought through the powers of the CRTC. In a speech entitled “The Twilight of Liberty”, the second included in the collection Those Things We Treasure (Macmillan, 1972), Diefenbaker said: 

The Trudeau Government seems to be dedicated to controlling the thinking of Canadians.   Through the power being exerted by Pierre Juneau, as Chairman of the Canadian Radio and Television Commission, (2) private radio and T.V. station proprietors in Canada are frightened to speak, fearful of being subject to the cancellation of their licences.   One such station was CKPM in Ottawa, which dared to have an open line program critical of the Government.  Pierre Juneau did come before a Committee of the House and he uttered lachrymose words in reply to the criticism leveled at him that he wishes to determine what Canadians shall hear, and to deny them the right to listen to what they will.   His attitude was different when he spoke to the Association of Private Broadcasting Companies and in effect stated: “When I ope my lips, let no dog bark.” Under him the broadcasting network owned by the people of Canada is allowed to broadcast what he permits

Diefenbaker’s warning of decades ago has gone largely unheeded, perhaps because the CRTC’s official raison d’être is cultural protectionism which appeals to a much broader range of Canadians than its more covert purpose of limiting freedom of thought. Certainly right-of-centre Canadians of the more traditional variety, such as Diefenbaker himself or this writer, would have no objections to the idea that Canadian culture ought to remain Canadian. It needs to be pointed out, however, that the CRTC has been a total failure in this regards.  Fifty-three years later, the Canada of 2021 is far more Americanized culturally than the Canada of 1968 was. Indeed, much of what Canadians regard as distinctly “Canadian” culture today, is merely Hollywood culture with a maple leaf stamped on it. Read the novels of Mazo de la Roche and Robertson Davies if you want a taste of the more authentic pre-CRTC Canadian culture.  Since the CRTC failed in its official appointed task, probably because its real purpose was thought control all along, there is hardly grounds here for extending its reach over the new online media. Indeed, the scarcely disguised agenda of censorship and thought control behind the move to so extend its reach, is sufficient reason why this bill, amended or otherwise, must never be allowed to pass. It is also more than sufficient reason for voting the Trudeau Liberals who dreamed it up in the first place out of Parliament and never allowing them to resume power again. For as Rex Murphy  pointed out earlier this week, “What is more galling and more threatening that the bill itself, however, is the set of mind behind it”, and that won’t go away even if the bill itself does. 


Contact Gerry T. Neal at:


(1) Disturbingly, the leaders of the other parties – including the present leader of the Conservatives – have taken to aping his example in this.

(2) The full name of this agency was changed into the awkward and absurd redundancy that it is now in 1976, but the acronym remains the same.